par Maurice Y. Michaud (il/lui)
C'est avec un mélange de tristesse et de dégoût que je remets ce Prix du Pire Électorat à la province de l'Ontario, qui est décerné à la juridiction ayant le pire taux de participation, qui a mené Personne à gagner le plus de sièges au Canada.
Arrêtez de rire, Alberta, Colombie-Britannique et Manitoba ! Vous êtes presque aussi pire. Quant à toi, Terre-Neuve, une carence en huile de foie de morue depuis 1993 semble t'empêcher de te bâtir assez de force pour aller voter. (On t'excuse pour 2021, à cause de la vague de COVID durant la campagne.) Puis ça ne va pas, chère Nouvelle-Écosse ? Autrefois en tête de classe, maintenant tu te retrouves en queue de peloton avec les provinces de l'Ouest. Et oui, Saskatchewan, tu glisses !
Mais bravo à l'Île-du-Prince-Édouard ! Tu restes la meilleure de la classe. Certes, tu as laissé passer Personne une fois sur quatre en 2023, ce qui est beaucoup pour toi, mais une fois n'est pas coutume, n'est-ce pas ?
Dans ce tableau, chaque grand nombre en gras représente le nombre de fois où Personne a gagné lors de ces élections générales particulières. Tous ces nombres, sauf si la valeur est zéro, sont cliquables. Ainsi, vous pouvez obtenir la liste des comtés où Personne a gagné, ainsi que les noms de ceuxes qui ont effectivement été élu·e·s.
Année | BC | AB | SK | MB | ON | QC | NB | NS | PE | NL | YT | NT | NU |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 | 59 / 87 67.82% PCU |
56 / 57 98.25% NPD |
7 / 27 25.93% PC |
13 / 19 68.42% IND |
|||||||||
2022 | 124 / 124 100.00% PC |
64 / 125 51.20% CAQ |
|||||||||||
2021 | 49 / 55 89.09% PC |
40 / 40 100.00% LIB |
12 / 19 63.16% LIB |
16 / 22 72.73% IND |
|||||||||
2020 | 83 / 87 95.40% NPD |
45 / 61 73.77% PSK |
20 / 49 40.82% PC |
||||||||||
2019 | 35 / 87 40.23% PCU |
51 / 57 89.47% PC |
3 / 27 11.11% PC |
28 / 40 70.00% LIB |
16 / 19 84.21% IND |
||||||||
2018 | 122 / 124 98.39% PC |
71 / 125 56.80% CAQ |
32 / 49 65.31% LIB |
||||||||||
2017 | 77 / 87 88.51% LIB |
47 / 51 92.16% LIB |
14 / 22 63.64% IND |
||||||||||
2016 | 39 / 61 63.93% PSK |
46 / 57 80.70% PC |
3 / 19 15.79% LIB |
||||||||||
2015 | 84 / 87 96.55% NPD |
0 / 27 0.00% LIB |
35 / 40 87.50% LIB |
17 / 19 89.47% IND |
|||||||||
2014 | 107 / 107 100.00% LIB |
49 / 125 39.20% PLQ |
30 / 49 61.22% LIB |
||||||||||
2013 | 80 / 85 94.12% LIB |
43 / 51 84.31% LIB |
13 / 22 59.09% IND |
||||||||||
2012 | 87 / 87 100.00% PC |
20 / 125 16.00% PQ |
|||||||||||
2011 | 9 / 58 15.52% PSK |
49 / 57 85.96% NPD |
107 / 107 100.00% LIB |
1 / 27 3.70% LIB |
33 / 48 68.75% PC |
3 / 19 15.79% YP |
12 / 19 63.16% IND |
||||||
2010 | 13 / 55 23.64% PC |
||||||||||||
2009 | 84 / 85 98.82% LIB |
41 / 52 78.85% NPD |
|||||||||||
2008 | 83 / 83 100.00% PC |
123 / 125 98.40% PLQ |
8 / 19 42.11% IND |
||||||||||
2007 | 2 / 58 3.45% PSK |
51 / 57 89.47% NPD |
107 / 107 100.00% LIB |
46 / 125 36.80% PLQ |
0 / 27 0.00% LIB |
12 / 48 25.00% PC |
6 / 19 31.58% IND |
||||||
2006 | 16 / 55 29.09% LIB |
43 / 52 82.69% PC |
4 / 18 22.22% YP |
||||||||||
2005 | 60 / 79 75.95% LIB |
||||||||||||
2004 | 82 / 83 98.80% PC |
2 / 19 10.53% IND |
|||||||||||
2003 | 8 / 58 13.79% NPD |
55 / 57 96.49% NPD |
103 / 103 100.00% LIB |
30 / 125 24.00% PLQ |
22 / 55 40.00% PC |
32 / 52 61.54% PC |
0 / 27 0.00% PC |
13 / 48 27.08% PC |
13 / 19 68.42% IND |
||||
2002 | 1 / 18 5.56% YP |
||||||||||||
2001 | 11 / 79 13.92% LIB |
74 / 83 89.16% PC |
|||||||||||
2000 | 0 / 27 0.00% PC |
1 / 17 5.88% LIB |
|||||||||||
1999 | 34 / 58 58.62% NPD |
18 / 57 31.58% NPD |
101 / 103 98.06% PC |
4 / 55 7.27% PC |
23 / 52 44.23% PC |
35 / 48 72.92% LIB |
6 / 19 31.58% IND |
1 / 19 5.26% IND |
|||||
1998 | 2 / 125 1.60% PQ |
26 / 52 50.00% LIB |
|||||||||||
1997 | 83 / 83 100.00% PC |
||||||||||||
1996 | 16 / 75 21.33% NPD |
0 / 27 0.00% PC |
12 / 48 25.00% LIB |
0 / 17 0.00% NPD |
|||||||||
1995 | 35 / 58 60.34% NPD |
16 / 57 28.07% PC |
95 / 130 73.08% PC |
9 / 55 16.36% LIB |
7 / 24 29.17% IND |
||||||||
1994 | 1 / 125 0.80% PQ |
||||||||||||
1993 | 68 / 83 81.93% PC |
5 / 52 9.62% LIB |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
19 / 52 36.54% LIB |
|||||||||
1992 | 1 / 17 5.88% YP |
||||||||||||
1991 | 6 / 75 8.00% NPD |
0 / 66 0.00% NPD |
5 / 58 8.62% LIB |
4 / 24 16.67% IND |
|||||||||
1990 | 18 / 57 31.58% PC |
109 / 130 83.85% NPD |
|||||||||||
1989 | 77 / 83 92.77% PC |
7 / 125 5.60% PLQ |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
1 / 52 1.92% LIB |
0 / 16 0.00% NPD |
||||||||
1988 | 12 / 57 21.05% PC |
3 / 52 5.77% PC |
|||||||||||
1987 | 106 / 130 81.54% LIB |
0 / 58 0.00% LIB |
6 / 24 25.00% IND |
||||||||||
1986 | 0 / 69 0.00% CS |
81 / 83 97.59% PC |
0 / 64 0.00% PC |
17 / 57 29.82% NPD |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
||||||||
1985 | 104 / 125 83.20% PC |
7 / 122 5.74% PLQ |
1 / 52 1.92% PC |
0 / 16 0.00% NPD |
|||||||||
1984 | 19 / 52 36.54% PC |
||||||||||||
1983 | 1 / 57 1.75% CS |
5 / 24 20.83% IND |
|||||||||||
1982 | 20 / 79 25.32% PC |
2 / 64 3.13% PC |
1 / 58 1.72% PC |
0 / 32 0.00% PC |
1 / 52 1.92% PC |
0 / 16 0.00% PC |
|||||||
1981 | 3 / 57 5.26% NPD |
116 / 125 92.80% PC |
1 / 122 0.82% PQ |
3 / 52 5.77% PC |
|||||||||
1979 | 9 / 57 15.79% CS |
47 / 79 59.49% PC |
0 / 32 0.00% PC |
6 / 52 11.54% PC |
14 / 22 63.64% IND |
||||||||
1978 | 0 / 61 0.00% NPD |
6 / 58 10.34% PC |
1 / 52 1.92% PC |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
8 / 16 50.00% PC |
||||||||
1977 | 5 / 57 8.77% PC |
79 / 125 63.20% PC |
|||||||||||
1976 | 1 / 110 0.91% PQ |
||||||||||||
1975 | 11 / 55 20.00% CS |
35 / 75 46.67% PC |
2 / 61 3.28% NPD |
73 / 125 58.40% PC |
5 / 51 9.80% PC |
5 / 15 33.33% IND |
|||||||
1974 | 1 / 58 1.72% PC |
0 / 46 0.00% LIB |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
6 / 12 50.00% IND |
|||||||||
1973 | 2 / 57 3.51% NPD |
2 / 110 1.82% PLQ |
|||||||||||
1972 | 20 / 55 36.36% NPD |
0 / 42 0.00% PC |
|||||||||||
1971 | 13 / 75 17.33% PC |
0 / 60 0.00% NPD |
14 / 117 11.97% PC |
0 / 42 0.00% LIB |
|||||||||
1970 | 1 / 108 0.93% PLQ |
0 / 58 0.00% PC |
1 / 46 2.17% LIB |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
2 / 7 28.57% IND |
2 / 10 20.00% IND |
|||||||
1969 | 13 / 55 23.64% CS |
34 / 57 59.65% NPD |
|||||||||||
1967 | 37 / 65 56.92% CS |
1 / 59 1.69% LIB |
69 / 117 58.97% PC |
0 / 58 0.00% LIB |
1 / 46 2.17% PC |
4 / 7 57.14% IND |
|||||||
1966 | 14 / 55 25.45% CS |
37 / 57 64.91% PC |
20 / 108 18.52% UN |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
11 / 42 26.19% LIB |
||||||||
1964 | 1 / 59 1.69% LIB |
2 / 4 50.00% IND |
|||||||||||
1963 | 13 / 52 25.00% CS |
37 / 63 58.73% CS |
69 / 108 63.89% PC |
52 LIB |
1 / 43 2.33% PC |
||||||||
1962 | 27 / 57 47.37% PC |
4 / 95 4.21% PLQ |
30 PC |
20 / 42 47.62% LIB |
|||||||||
1960 | 10 / 52 19.23% CS |
2 / 55 3.64% FCC |
4 / 95 4.21% PLQ |
52 LIB |
0 / 43 0.00% PC |
2 / 4 50.00% IND |
|||||||
1959 | 22 / 65 33.85% CS |
24 / 57 42.11% PC |
67 / 98 68.37% PC |
30 PC |
5 / 36 13.89% LIB |
||||||||
1958 | 35 / 57 61.40% PC |
||||||||||||
1957 | 1 / 4 25.00% IND |
||||||||||||
1956 | 20 / 52 38.46% CS |
0 / 53 0.00% FCC |
6 / 93 6.45% UN |
52 PC |
0 / 43 0.00% PC |
5 / 36 13.89% LIB |
|||||||
1955 | 6 / 61 9.84% CS |
61 / 98 62.24% PC |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1954 | 1 / 4 25.00% IND |
||||||||||||
1953 | 17 / 48 35.42% CS |
19 / 57 33.33% LIBP |
0 / 37 0.00% LIB |
||||||||||
1952 | 28 / 48 58.33% CS |
19 / 61 31.15% CS |
0 / 53 0.00% FCC |
11 / 92 11.96% UN |
52 PC |
||||||||
1951 | 45 / 90 50.00% PC |
30 LIB |
2 / 28 7.14% LIB |
3 / 3 100.00% IND |
|||||||||
1949 | 3 / 48 6.25% COAL |
14 / 57 24.56% COAL |
1 / 37 2.70% LIB |
1 / 28 3.57% LIB |
|||||||||
1948 | 13 / 57 22.81% CS |
1 / 52 1.92% FCC |
47 / 90 52.22% PC |
11 / 92 11.96% UN |
52 LIB |
||||||||
1947 | 30 LIB |
||||||||||||
1945 | 9 / 48 18.75% COAL |
25 / 55 45.45% COAL |
24 / 90 26.67% PC |
11 / 30 36.67% LIB |
|||||||||
1944 | 9 / 60 15.00% CS |
5 / 55 9.09% FCC |
17 / 91 18.68% UN |
48 LIB |
|||||||||
1943 | 78 / 90 86.67% PC |
30 LIB |
|||||||||||
1941 | 11 / 48 22.92% LIB |
19 / 55 34.55% COAL |
13 / 30 43.33% LIB |
||||||||||
1940 | 9 / 57 15.79% CS |
||||||||||||
1939 | 2 / 86 2.33% PLQ |
48 LIB |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1938 | 1 / 52 1.92% LIB |
||||||||||||
1937 | 11 / 48 22.92% LIB |
16 / 90 17.78% LIB |
0 / 30 0.00% LIB |
||||||||||
1936 | 15 / 55 27.27% LIBP |
9 / 90 10.00% UN |
|||||||||||
1935 | 0 / 63 0.00% CS |
10 / 90 11.11% PLQ |
48 LIB |
30 LIB |
|||||||||
1934 | 1 / 55 1.82% LIB |
16 / 90 17.78% LIB |
|||||||||||
1933 | 7 / 47 14.89% LIB |
0 / 30 0.00% LIB |
|||||||||||
1932 | 4 / 55 7.27% LIBP |
||||||||||||
1931 | 4 / 90 4.44% PLQ |
30 CONS |
|||||||||||
1930 | 8 / 63 12.70% FUA |
48 CONS |
|||||||||||
1929 | 1 / 63 1.59% CONS |
55 / 112 49.11% LC |
|||||||||||
1928 | 6 / 48 12.50% CONS |
43 LC |
|||||||||||
1927 | 23 / 55 41.82% PROG |
20 / 85 23.53% PLQ |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1926 | 11 / 60 18.33% FUA |
35 / 112 31.25% LC |
|||||||||||
1925 | 34 / 63 53.97% LIB |
48 CONS |
43 LC |
||||||||||
1924 | 16 / 48 33.33% LIB |
||||||||||||
1923 | 76 / 111 68.47% LC |
32 / 85 37.65% PLQ |
30 CONS |
||||||||||
1922 | 15 / 55 27.27% PROG |
||||||||||||
1921 | 1 / 61 1.64% FUA |
63 LIB |
|||||||||||
1920 | 6 / 47 12.77% LIB |
18 / 55 32.73% LIB |
48 LIB |
43 LIB |
|||||||||
1919 | 25 / 111 22.52% FUO |
17 / 81 20.99% PLQ |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1917 | 11 / 58 18.97% LIB |
5 / 62 8.06% LIB |
48 LIB |
||||||||||
1916 | 21 / 47 44.68% LIB |
17 / 81 20.99% PLQ |
43 LIB |
||||||||||
1915 | 2 / 47 4.26% LIB |
30 CONS |
|||||||||||
1914 | 0 / 49 0.00% CONS |
20 / 111 18.02% LC |
|||||||||||
1913 | 11 / 56 19.64% LIB |
||||||||||||
1912 | 10 / 42 23.81% LC |
31 / 54 57.41% LIB |
21 / 81 25.93% PLQ |
48 IND |
30 CONS |
||||||||
1911 | 37 / 106 34.91% LC |
38 LIB |
|||||||||||
1910 | 1 / 41 2.44% CONS |
||||||||||||
1909 | 13 / 42 30.95% LC |
1 / 41 2.44% LIB |
|||||||||||
1908 | 7 / 41 17.07% LIB |
27 / 106 25.47% LC |
15 / 74 20.27% PLQ |
46 IND |
30 LIB |
||||||||
1907 | 22 / 42 52.38% LC |
0 / 41 0.00% CONS |
|||||||||||
1906 | 38 LIB |
||||||||||||
1905 | 25 LIB |
25 LIB |
25 / 98 25.51% LC |
||||||||||
1904 | 17 / 74 22.97% PLQ |
30 LIB |
|||||||||||
1903 | 0 / 42 0.00% LC |
0 / 40 0.00% CONS |
46 IND |
||||||||||
1902 | 35 LICO |
22 / 98 22.45% LIB |
|||||||||||
1901 | 38 LIB |
||||||||||||
1900 | 20 / 38 52.63% IND |
12 / 74 16.22% PLQ |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1899 | 5 / 40 12.50% CONS |
46 IND |
|||||||||||
1898 | 18 / 38 47.37% IND |
31 IND |
9 / 94 9.57% LIB |
||||||||||
1897 | 13 / 74 17.57% PLQ |
38 LIB |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1896 | 7 / 40 17.50% LIB |
||||||||||||
1895 | 46 IND |
||||||||||||
1894 | 0 / 33 0.00% IND |
29 IND |
29 / 94 30.85% LIB |
38 LIB |
|||||||||
1893 | 30 LIB |
||||||||||||
1892 | 5 / 40 12.50% LIB |
0 / 73 0.00% CONS |
41 IND |
||||||||||
1891 | 26 IND |
||||||||||||
1890 | 8 / 33 24.24% IND |
35 / 91 38.46% LIB |
23 / 73 31.51% PLQ |
41 IND |
38 LIB |
30 CONS |
|||||||
1888 | 22 IND |
38 LIB |
|||||||||||
1886 | 4 / 27 14.81% IND |
28 / 35 80.00% CONS |
30 / 90 33.33% LIB |
16 / 65 24.62% CONS |
41 IND |
38 LIB |
30 CONS |
||||||
1883 | 30 CONS |
28 / 88 31.82% LIB |
|||||||||||
1882 | 3 / 25 12.00% IND |
41 IND |
38 LIB |
30 CONS |
|||||||||
1881 | 26 / 65 40.00% CONS |
||||||||||||
1879 | 24 CONS |
39 / 88 44.32% LIB |
30 CONS |
||||||||||
1878 | 3 / 25 12.00% IND |
9 / 24 37.50% IND |
15 / 65 23.08% PLQ |
41 IND |
38 LC |
||||||||
1876 | 30 FREE |
||||||||||||
1875 | 1 / 25 4.00% IND |
21 / 88 23.86% LIB |
19 / 65 29.23% CONS |
||||||||||
1874 | 9 / 24 37.50% IND |
41 IND |
38 LIB |
||||||||||
1873 | 30 CONS |
||||||||||||
1871 | 25 IND |
37 / 82 45.12% LIB |
15 / 65 23.08% CONS |
38 LIB |
|||||||||
1870 | 24 IND |
41 IND |
|||||||||||
1867 | 10 / 82 12.20% LC |
5 / 65 7.69% CONS |
38 ANTI |
||||||||||
1866 | 41 IND |
32 circonscriptions | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Juridiction: Type d'élection: Années: Ordre: |
Québec (Provincial} Élections générales Entre 1923 et 1923 Comté (alpha.) |
|||||
Évènement | Circonscription | Élu·e·s | ||||
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Abitibi Éligible: 4,885 Participation: 48.88% Personne: 2,497 (51.12%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Bonaventure Éligible: 7,940 Participation: 42.92% Personne: 4,532 (57.08%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Chambly Éligible: 5,545 Participation: 51.34% Personne: 2,698 (48.66%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Champlain Éligible: 11,664 Participation: 61.19% Personne: 4,527 (38.81%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Chicoutimi Éligible: 8,937 Participation: 38.58% Personne: 5,489 (61.42%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Compton Éligible: 5,713 Participation: 59.16% Personne: 2,333 (40.84%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Dorchester Éligible: 5,774 Participation: 63.35% Personne: 2,116 (36.65%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Drummond Éligible: 4,730 Participation: 57.38% Personne: 2,016 (42.62%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Frontenac Éligible: 4,973 Participation: 60.25% Personne: 1,977 (39.75%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Hull Éligible: 10,544 Participation: 45.19% Personne: 5,779 (54.81%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Huntingdon Éligible: 3,259 Participation: 59.44% Personne: 1,322 (40.56%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Lac-Saint-Jean Éligible: 8,308 Participation: 57.10% Personne: 3,564 (42.90%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Laval Éligible: 10,801 Participation: 61.36% Personne: 4,173 (38.64%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Maisonneuve Éligible: 14,001 Participation: 50.02% Personne: 6,997 (49.98%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Missisquoi Éligible: 4,710 Participation: 49.64% Personne: 2,372 (50.36%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Montréal—Saint Georges Éligible: 3,864 Participation: 47.23% Personne: 2,039 (52.77%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Montréal—Saint-Henri Éligible: 8,997 Participation: 57.49% Personne: 3,825 (42.51%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Montréal—Saint-Jacques Éligible: 7,882 Participation: 56.99% Personne: 3,390 (43.01%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Montréal—Saint-Laurent Éligible: 4,305 Participation: 50.62% Personne: 2,126 (49.38%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Montréal—Sainte-Anne Éligible: 6,077 Participation: 59.93% Personne: 2,435 (40.07%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Montréal—Sainte-Marie Éligible: 12,307 Participation: 50.47% Personne: 6,096 (49.53%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Montréal-Dorion Éligible: 7,667 Participation: 55.11% Personne: 3,442 (48.09%) |
LIBI |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Montréal-Laurier Éligible: 8,713 Participation: 45.93% Personne: 4,711 (54.07%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Montréal-Mercier Éligible: 17,296 Participation: 48.36% Personne: 8,932 (51.64%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Montréal-Verdun Éligible: 12,418 Participation: 55.19% Personne: 5,564 (44.81%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Papineau Éligible: 7,947 Participation: 49.29% Personne: 4,030 (50.71%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Pontiac Éligible: 5,463 Participation: 46.77% Personne: 2,908 (53.23%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Shefford Éligible: 6,503 Participation: 58.67% Personne: 2,688 (41.33%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Sherbrooke Éligible: 7,537 Participation: 60.44% Personne: 2,982 (39.56%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Stanstead Éligible: 6,127 Participation: 53.86% Personne: 2,827 (46.14%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Trois-Rivières Éligible: 4,990 Participation: 59.94% Personne: 1,999 (40.06%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 16 | G | 5 fév 1923 | Westmount Éligible: 12,398 Participation: 46.03% Personne: 6,691 (53.97%) |
CONS |