par Maurice Y. Michaud (il/lui)
C'est avec un mélange de tristesse et de dégoût que je remets ce Prix du Pire Électorat à la province de l'Ontario, qui est décerné à la juridiction ayant le pire taux de participation, qui a mené Personne à gagner le plus de sièges au Canada.
Arrêtez de rire, Alberta, Colombie-Britannique et Manitoba ! Vous êtes presque aussi pire. Quant à toi, Terre-Neuve, une carence en huile de foie de morue depuis 1993 semble t'empêcher de te bâtir assez de force pour aller voter. (On t'excuse pour 2021, à cause de la vague de COVID durant la campagne.) Puis ça ne va pas, chère Nouvelle-Écosse ? Autrefois en tête de classe, maintenant tu te retrouves en queue de peloton avec les provinces de l'Ouest. Et oui, Saskatchewan, tu glisses !
Mais bravo à l'Île-du-Prince-Édouard ! Tu restes la meilleure de la classe. Certes, tu as laissé passer Personne une fois sur quatre en 2023, ce qui est beaucoup pour toi, mais une fois n'est pas coutume, n'est-ce pas ?
Dans ce tableau, chaque grand nombre en gras représente le nombre de fois où Personne a gagné lors de ces élections générales particulières. Tous ces nombres, sauf si la valeur est zéro, sont cliquables. Ainsi, vous pouvez obtenir la liste des comtés où Personne a gagné, ainsi que les noms de ceuxes qui ont effectivement été élu·e·s.
Année | BC | AB | SK | MB | ON | QC | NB | NS | PE | NL | YT | NT | NU |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 | 59 / 87 67.82% PCU |
56 / 57 98.25% NPD |
7 / 27 25.93% PC |
13 / 19 68.42% IND |
|||||||||
2022 | 124 / 124 100.00% PC |
64 / 125 51.20% CAQ |
|||||||||||
2021 | 49 / 55 89.09% PC |
40 / 40 100.00% LIB |
12 / 19 63.16% LIB |
16 / 22 72.73% IND |
|||||||||
2020 | 83 / 87 95.40% NPD |
45 / 61 73.77% PSK |
20 / 49 40.82% PC |
||||||||||
2019 | 35 / 87 40.23% PCU |
51 / 57 89.47% PC |
3 / 27 11.11% PC |
28 / 40 70.00% LIB |
16 / 19 84.21% IND |
||||||||
2018 | 122 / 124 98.39% PC |
71 / 125 56.80% CAQ |
32 / 49 65.31% LIB |
||||||||||
2017 | 77 / 87 88.51% LIB |
47 / 51 92.16% LIB |
14 / 22 63.64% IND |
||||||||||
2016 | 39 / 61 63.93% PSK |
46 / 57 80.70% PC |
3 / 19 15.79% LIB |
||||||||||
2015 | 84 / 87 96.55% NPD |
0 / 27 0.00% LIB |
35 / 40 87.50% LIB |
17 / 19 89.47% IND |
|||||||||
2014 | 107 / 107 100.00% LIB |
49 / 125 39.20% PLQ |
30 / 49 61.22% LIB |
||||||||||
2013 | 80 / 85 94.12% LIB |
43 / 51 84.31% LIB |
13 / 22 59.09% IND |
||||||||||
2012 | 87 / 87 100.00% PC |
20 / 125 16.00% PQ |
|||||||||||
2011 | 9 / 58 15.52% PSK |
49 / 57 85.96% NPD |
107 / 107 100.00% LIB |
1 / 27 3.70% LIB |
33 / 48 68.75% PC |
3 / 19 15.79% YP |
12 / 19 63.16% IND |
||||||
2010 | 13 / 55 23.64% PC |
||||||||||||
2009 | 84 / 85 98.82% LIB |
41 / 52 78.85% NPD |
|||||||||||
2008 | 83 / 83 100.00% PC |
123 / 125 98.40% PLQ |
8 / 19 42.11% IND |
||||||||||
2007 | 2 / 58 3.45% PSK |
51 / 57 89.47% NPD |
107 / 107 100.00% LIB |
46 / 125 36.80% PLQ |
0 / 27 0.00% LIB |
12 / 48 25.00% PC |
6 / 19 31.58% IND |
||||||
2006 | 16 / 55 29.09% LIB |
43 / 52 82.69% PC |
4 / 18 22.22% YP |
||||||||||
2005 | 60 / 79 75.95% LIB |
||||||||||||
2004 | 82 / 83 98.80% PC |
2 / 19 10.53% IND |
|||||||||||
2003 | 8 / 58 13.79% NPD |
55 / 57 96.49% NPD |
103 / 103 100.00% LIB |
30 / 125 24.00% PLQ |
22 / 55 40.00% PC |
32 / 52 61.54% PC |
0 / 27 0.00% PC |
13 / 48 27.08% PC |
13 / 19 68.42% IND |
||||
2002 | 1 / 18 5.56% YP |
||||||||||||
2001 | 11 / 79 13.92% LIB |
74 / 83 89.16% PC |
|||||||||||
2000 | 0 / 27 0.00% PC |
1 / 17 5.88% LIB |
|||||||||||
1999 | 34 / 58 58.62% NPD |
18 / 57 31.58% NPD |
101 / 103 98.06% PC |
4 / 55 7.27% PC |
23 / 52 44.23% PC |
35 / 48 72.92% LIB |
6 / 19 31.58% IND |
1 / 19 5.26% IND |
|||||
1998 | 2 / 125 1.60% PQ |
26 / 52 50.00% LIB |
|||||||||||
1997 | 83 / 83 100.00% PC |
||||||||||||
1996 | 16 / 75 21.33% NPD |
0 / 27 0.00% PC |
12 / 48 25.00% LIB |
0 / 17 0.00% NPD |
|||||||||
1995 | 35 / 58 60.34% NPD |
16 / 57 28.07% PC |
95 / 130 73.08% PC |
9 / 55 16.36% LIB |
7 / 24 29.17% IND |
||||||||
1994 | 1 / 125 0.80% PQ |
||||||||||||
1993 | 68 / 83 81.93% PC |
5 / 52 9.62% LIB |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
19 / 52 36.54% LIB |
|||||||||
1992 | 1 / 17 5.88% YP |
||||||||||||
1991 | 6 / 75 8.00% NPD |
0 / 66 0.00% NPD |
5 / 58 8.62% LIB |
4 / 24 16.67% IND |
|||||||||
1990 | 18 / 57 31.58% PC |
109 / 130 83.85% NPD |
|||||||||||
1989 | 77 / 83 92.77% PC |
7 / 125 5.60% PLQ |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
1 / 52 1.92% LIB |
0 / 16 0.00% NPD |
||||||||
1988 | 12 / 57 21.05% PC |
3 / 52 5.77% PC |
|||||||||||
1987 | 106 / 130 81.54% LIB |
0 / 58 0.00% LIB |
6 / 24 25.00% IND |
||||||||||
1986 | 0 / 69 0.00% CS |
81 / 83 97.59% PC |
0 / 64 0.00% PC |
17 / 57 29.82% NPD |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
||||||||
1985 | 104 / 125 83.20% PC |
7 / 122 5.74% PLQ |
1 / 52 1.92% PC |
0 / 16 0.00% NPD |
|||||||||
1984 | 19 / 52 36.54% PC |
||||||||||||
1983 | 1 / 57 1.75% CS |
5 / 24 20.83% IND |
|||||||||||
1982 | 20 / 79 25.32% PC |
2 / 64 3.13% PC |
1 / 58 1.72% PC |
0 / 32 0.00% PC |
1 / 52 1.92% PC |
0 / 16 0.00% PC |
|||||||
1981 | 3 / 57 5.26% NPD |
116 / 125 92.80% PC |
1 / 122 0.82% PQ |
3 / 52 5.77% PC |
|||||||||
1979 | 9 / 57 15.79% CS |
47 / 79 59.49% PC |
0 / 32 0.00% PC |
6 / 52 11.54% PC |
14 / 22 63.64% IND |
||||||||
1978 | 0 / 61 0.00% NPD |
6 / 58 10.34% PC |
1 / 52 1.92% PC |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
8 / 16 50.00% PC |
||||||||
1977 | 5 / 57 8.77% PC |
79 / 125 63.20% PC |
|||||||||||
1976 | 1 / 110 0.91% PQ |
||||||||||||
1975 | 11 / 55 20.00% CS |
35 / 75 46.67% PC |
2 / 61 3.28% NPD |
73 / 125 58.40% PC |
5 / 51 9.80% PC |
5 / 15 33.33% IND |
|||||||
1974 | 1 / 58 1.72% PC |
0 / 46 0.00% LIB |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
6 / 12 50.00% IND |
|||||||||
1973 | 2 / 57 3.51% NPD |
2 / 110 1.82% PLQ |
|||||||||||
1972 | 20 / 55 36.36% NPD |
0 / 42 0.00% PC |
|||||||||||
1971 | 13 / 75 17.33% PC |
0 / 60 0.00% NPD |
14 / 117 11.97% PC |
0 / 42 0.00% LIB |
|||||||||
1970 | 1 / 108 0.93% PLQ |
0 / 58 0.00% PC |
1 / 46 2.17% LIB |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
2 / 7 28.57% IND |
2 / 10 20.00% IND |
|||||||
1969 | 13 / 55 23.64% CS |
34 / 57 59.65% NPD |
|||||||||||
1967 | 37 / 65 56.92% CS |
1 / 59 1.69% LIB |
69 / 117 58.97% PC |
0 / 58 0.00% LIB |
1 / 46 2.17% PC |
4 / 7 57.14% IND |
|||||||
1966 | 14 / 55 25.45% CS |
37 / 57 64.91% PC |
20 / 108 18.52% UN |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
11 / 42 26.19% LIB |
||||||||
1964 | 1 / 59 1.69% LIB |
2 / 4 50.00% IND |
|||||||||||
1963 | 13 / 52 25.00% CS |
37 / 63 58.73% CS |
69 / 108 63.89% PC |
52 LIB |
1 / 43 2.33% PC |
||||||||
1962 | 27 / 57 47.37% PC |
4 / 95 4.21% PLQ |
30 PC |
20 / 42 47.62% LIB |
|||||||||
1960 | 10 / 52 19.23% CS |
2 / 55 3.64% FCC |
4 / 95 4.21% PLQ |
52 LIB |
0 / 43 0.00% PC |
2 / 4 50.00% IND |
|||||||
1959 | 22 / 65 33.85% CS |
24 / 57 42.11% PC |
67 / 98 68.37% PC |
30 PC |
5 / 36 13.89% LIB |
||||||||
1958 | 35 / 57 61.40% PC |
||||||||||||
1957 | 1 / 4 25.00% IND |
||||||||||||
1956 | 20 / 52 38.46% CS |
0 / 53 0.00% FCC |
6 / 93 6.45% UN |
52 PC |
0 / 43 0.00% PC |
5 / 36 13.89% LIB |
|||||||
1955 | 6 / 61 9.84% CS |
61 / 98 62.24% PC |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1954 | 1 / 4 25.00% IND |
||||||||||||
1953 | 17 / 48 35.42% CS |
19 / 57 33.33% LIBP |
0 / 37 0.00% LIB |
||||||||||
1952 | 28 / 48 58.33% CS |
19 / 61 31.15% CS |
0 / 53 0.00% FCC |
11 / 92 11.96% UN |
52 PC |
||||||||
1951 | 45 / 90 50.00% PC |
30 LIB |
2 / 28 7.14% LIB |
3 / 3 100.00% IND |
|||||||||
1949 | 3 / 48 6.25% COAL |
14 / 57 24.56% COAL |
1 / 37 2.70% LIB |
1 / 28 3.57% LIB |
|||||||||
1948 | 13 / 57 22.81% CS |
1 / 52 1.92% FCC |
47 / 90 52.22% PC |
11 / 92 11.96% UN |
52 LIB |
||||||||
1947 | 30 LIB |
||||||||||||
1945 | 9 / 48 18.75% COAL |
25 / 55 45.45% COAL |
24 / 90 26.67% PC |
11 / 30 36.67% LIB |
|||||||||
1944 | 9 / 60 15.00% CS |
5 / 55 9.09% FCC |
17 / 91 18.68% UN |
48 LIB |
|||||||||
1943 | 78 / 90 86.67% PC |
30 LIB |
|||||||||||
1941 | 11 / 48 22.92% LIB |
19 / 55 34.55% COAL |
13 / 30 43.33% LIB |
||||||||||
1940 | 9 / 57 15.79% CS |
||||||||||||
1939 | 2 / 86 2.33% PLQ |
48 LIB |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1938 | 1 / 52 1.92% LIB |
||||||||||||
1937 | 11 / 48 22.92% LIB |
16 / 90 17.78% LIB |
0 / 30 0.00% LIB |
||||||||||
1936 | 15 / 55 27.27% LIBP |
9 / 90 10.00% UN |
|||||||||||
1935 | 0 / 63 0.00% CS |
10 / 90 11.11% PLQ |
48 LIB |
30 LIB |
|||||||||
1934 | 1 / 55 1.82% LIB |
16 / 90 17.78% LIB |
|||||||||||
1933 | 7 / 47 14.89% LIB |
0 / 30 0.00% LIB |
|||||||||||
1932 | 4 / 55 7.27% LIBP |
||||||||||||
1931 | 4 / 90 4.44% PLQ |
30 CONS |
|||||||||||
1930 | 8 / 63 12.70% FUA |
48 CONS |
|||||||||||
1929 | 1 / 63 1.59% CONS |
55 / 112 49.11% LC |
|||||||||||
1928 | 6 / 48 12.50% CONS |
43 LC |
|||||||||||
1927 | 23 / 55 41.82% PROG |
20 / 85 23.53% PLQ |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1926 | 11 / 60 18.33% FUA |
35 / 112 31.25% LC |
|||||||||||
1925 | 34 / 63 53.97% LIB |
48 CONS |
43 LC |
||||||||||
1924 | 16 / 48 33.33% LIB |
||||||||||||
1923 | 76 / 111 68.47% LC |
32 / 85 37.65% PLQ |
30 CONS |
||||||||||
1922 | 15 / 55 27.27% PROG |
||||||||||||
1921 | 1 / 61 1.64% FUA |
63 LIB |
|||||||||||
1920 | 6 / 47 12.77% LIB |
18 / 55 32.73% LIB |
48 LIB |
43 LIB |
|||||||||
1919 | 25 / 111 22.52% FUO |
17 / 81 20.99% PLQ |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1917 | 11 / 58 18.97% LIB |
5 / 62 8.06% LIB |
48 LIB |
||||||||||
1916 | 21 / 47 44.68% LIB |
17 / 81 20.99% PLQ |
43 LIB |
||||||||||
1915 | 2 / 47 4.26% LIB |
30 CONS |
|||||||||||
1914 | 0 / 49 0.00% CONS |
20 / 111 18.02% LC |
|||||||||||
1913 | 11 / 56 19.64% LIB |
||||||||||||
1912 | 10 / 42 23.81% LC |
31 / 54 57.41% LIB |
21 / 81 25.93% PLQ |
48 IND |
30 CONS |
||||||||
1911 | 37 / 106 34.91% LC |
38 LIB |
|||||||||||
1910 | 1 / 41 2.44% CONS |
||||||||||||
1909 | 13 / 42 30.95% LC |
1 / 41 2.44% LIB |
|||||||||||
1908 | 7 / 41 17.07% LIB |
27 / 106 25.47% LC |
15 / 74 20.27% PLQ |
46 IND |
30 LIB |
||||||||
1907 | 22 / 42 52.38% LC |
0 / 41 0.00% CONS |
|||||||||||
1906 | 38 LIB |
||||||||||||
1905 | 25 LIB |
25 LIB |
25 / 98 25.51% LC |
||||||||||
1904 | 17 / 74 22.97% PLQ |
30 LIB |
|||||||||||
1903 | 0 / 42 0.00% LC |
0 / 40 0.00% CONS |
46 IND |
||||||||||
1902 | 35 LICO |
22 / 98 22.45% LIB |
|||||||||||
1901 | 38 LIB |
||||||||||||
1900 | 20 / 38 52.63% IND |
12 / 74 16.22% PLQ |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1899 | 5 / 40 12.50% CONS |
46 IND |
|||||||||||
1898 | 18 / 38 47.37% IND |
31 IND |
9 / 94 9.57% LIB |
||||||||||
1897 | 13 / 74 17.57% PLQ |
38 LIB |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1896 | 7 / 40 17.50% LIB |
||||||||||||
1895 | 46 IND |
||||||||||||
1894 | 0 / 33 0.00% IND |
29 IND |
29 / 94 30.85% LIB |
38 LIB |
|||||||||
1893 | 30 LIB |
||||||||||||
1892 | 5 / 40 12.50% LIB |
0 / 73 0.00% CONS |
41 IND |
||||||||||
1891 | 26 IND |
||||||||||||
1890 | 8 / 33 24.24% IND |
35 / 91 38.46% LIB |
23 / 73 31.51% PLQ |
41 IND |
38 LIB |
30 CONS |
|||||||
1888 | 22 IND |
38 LIB |
|||||||||||
1886 | 4 / 27 14.81% IND |
28 / 35 80.00% CONS |
30 / 90 33.33% LIB |
16 / 65 24.62% CONS |
41 IND |
38 LIB |
30 CONS |
||||||
1883 | 30 CONS |
28 / 88 31.82% LIB |
|||||||||||
1882 | 3 / 25 12.00% IND |
41 IND |
38 LIB |
30 CONS |
|||||||||
1881 | 26 / 65 40.00% CONS |
||||||||||||
1879 | 24 CONS |
39 / 88 44.32% LIB |
30 CONS |
||||||||||
1878 | 3 / 25 12.00% IND |
9 / 24 37.50% IND |
15 / 65 23.08% PLQ |
41 IND |
38 LC |
||||||||
1876 | 30 FREE |
||||||||||||
1875 | 1 / 25 4.00% IND |
21 / 88 23.86% LIB |
19 / 65 29.23% CONS |
||||||||||
1874 | 9 / 24 37.50% IND |
41 IND |
38 LIB |
||||||||||
1873 | 30 CONS |
||||||||||||
1871 | 25 IND |
37 / 82 45.12% LIB |
15 / 65 23.08% CONS |
38 LIB |
|||||||||
1870 | 24 IND |
41 IND |
|||||||||||
1867 | 10 / 82 12.20% LC |
5 / 65 7.69% CONS |
38 ANTI |
||||||||||
1866 | 41 IND |
22 circonscriptions | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Juridiction: Type d'élection: Années: Ordre: |
Ontario (Provincial} Élections générales Entre 1902 et 1902 Comté (alpha.) |
|||||
Évènement | Circonscription | Élu·e·s | ||||
ON | 10 | G | 29 mai 1902 | Addington Éligible: 4,846 Participation: 59.37% Personne: 1,969 (40.63%) |
LC |
|
ON | 10 | G | 29 mai 1902 | Algoma Éligible: 6,202 Participation: 53.53% Personne: 2,882 (46.47%) |
LC |
|
ON | 10 | G | 29 mai 1902 | Cardwell Éligible: 5,699 Participation: 56.50% Personne: 2,479 (43.50%) |
LC |
|
ON | 10 | G | 29 mai 1902 | Carleton Éligible: 5,000 Participation: 54.68% Personne: 2,266 (45.32%) |
LC |
|
ON | 10 | G | 29 mai 1902 | Dufferin Éligible: 6,215 Participation: 50.78% Personne: 3,059 (49.22%) |
LC |
|
ON | 10 | G | 29 mai 1902 | Fort William and Lake of the Woods Éligible: 5,011 Participation: 52.78% Personne: 2,366 (47.22%) |
LIB |
|
ON | 10 | G | 29 mai 1902 | Grenville Éligible: 6,038 Participation: 61.11% Personne: 2,348 (38.89%) |
LC |
|
ON | 10 | G | 29 mai 1902 | Hastings West Éligible: 5,415 Participation: 64.34% Personne: 1,931 (35.66%) |
LC |
|
ON | 10 | G | 29 mai 1902 | Manitoulin Éligible: 5,349 Participation: 44.31% Personne: 2,979 (55.69%) |
LC |
|
ON | 10 | G | 29 mai 1902 | Nipissing East Éligible: 4,491 Participation: 50.26% Personne: 2,234 (49.74%) |
LIB |
|
ON | 10 | G | 29 mai 1902 | Nipissing West Éligible: 4,196 Participation: 51.26% Personne: 2,045 (48.74%) |
LIB |
|
ON | 10 | G | 29 mai 1902 | Oxford North Éligible: 6,811 Participation: 65.26% Personne: 2,366 (34.74%) |
LIB |
|
ON | 10 | G | 29 mai 1902 | Oxford South Éligible: 6,666 Participation: 58.76% Personne: 2,749 (41.24%) |
LC |
|
ON | 10 | G | 29 mai 1902 | Parry Sound Éligible: 11,263 Participation: 41.45% Personne: 6,594 (58.55%) |
LIB |
|
ON | 10 | G | 29 mai 1902 | Port Arthur and Rainy River Éligible: 3,667 Participation: 46.06% Personne: 1,978 (53.94%) |
LIB |
|
ON | 10 | G | 29 mai 1902 | Russell Éligible: 7,991 Participation: 53.44% Personne: 3,721 (46.56%) |
LIB |
|
ON | 10 | G | 29 mai 1902 | Sault Ste. Marie Éligible: 4,883 Participation: 51.69% Personne: 2,359 (48.31%) |
LC |
|
ON | 10 | G | 29 mai 1902 | Simcoe West Éligible: 5,382 Participation: 46.15% Personne: 2,898 (53.85%) |
LC |
|
ON | 10 | G | 29 mai 1902 | Toronto East Éligible: 10,245 Participation: 56.73% Personne: 4,433 (43.27%) |
LC |
|
ON | 10 | G | 29 mai 1902 | Toronto North Éligible: 13,258 Participation: 56.62% Personne: 5,751 (43.38%) |
LC |
|
ON | 10 | G | 29 mai 1902 | Toronto South Éligible: 16,466 Participation: 59.15% Personne: 6,727 (40.85%) |
LC |
|
ON | 10 | G | 29 mai 1902 | Toronto West Éligible: 14,318 Participation: 51.24% Personne: 6,981 (48.76%) |
LC |