par Maurice Y. Michaud (il/lui)
C'est avec un mélange de tristesse et de dégoût que je remets ce Prix du Pire Électorat à la province de l'Ontario, qui est décerné à la juridiction ayant le pire taux de participation, qui a mené Personne à gagner le plus de sièges au Canada.
Arrêtez de rire, Alberta, Colombie-Britannique et Manitoba ! Vous êtes presque aussi pire. Quant à toi, Terre-Neuve, une carence en huile de foie de morue depuis 1993 semble t'empêcher de te bâtir assez de force pour aller voter. (On t'excuse pour 2021, à cause de la vague de COVID durant la campagne.) Puis ça ne va pas, chère Nouvelle-Écosse ? Autrefois en tête de classe, maintenant tu te retrouves en queue de peloton avec les provinces de l'Ouest. Et oui, Saskatchewan, tu glisses !
Mais bravo à l'Île-du-Prince-Édouard ! Tu restes la meilleure de la classe. Certes, tu as laissé passer Personne une fois sur quatre en 2023, ce qui est beaucoup pour toi, mais une fois n'est pas coutume, n'est-ce pas ?
Dans ce tableau, chaque grand nombre en gras représente le nombre de fois où Personne a gagné lors de ces élections générales particulières. Tous ces nombres, sauf si la valeur est zéro, sont cliquables. Ainsi, vous pouvez obtenir la liste des comtés où Personne a gagné, ainsi que les noms de ceuxes qui ont effectivement été élu·e·s.
Année | BC | AB | SK | MB | ON | QC | NB | NS | PE | NL | YT | NT | NU |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 | 59 / 87 67.82% PCU |
56 / 57 98.25% NPD |
7 / 27 25.93% PC |
13 / 19 68.42% IND |
|||||||||
2022 | 124 / 124 100.00% PC |
64 / 125 51.20% CAQ |
|||||||||||
2021 | 49 / 55 89.09% PC |
40 / 40 100.00% LIB |
12 / 19 63.16% LIB |
16 / 22 72.73% IND |
|||||||||
2020 | 83 / 87 95.40% NPD |
45 / 61 73.77% PSK |
20 / 49 40.82% PC |
||||||||||
2019 | 35 / 87 40.23% PCU |
51 / 57 89.47% PC |
3 / 27 11.11% PC |
28 / 40 70.00% LIB |
16 / 19 84.21% IND |
||||||||
2018 | 122 / 124 98.39% PC |
71 / 125 56.80% CAQ |
32 / 49 65.31% LIB |
||||||||||
2017 | 77 / 87 88.51% LIB |
47 / 51 92.16% LIB |
14 / 22 63.64% IND |
||||||||||
2016 | 39 / 61 63.93% PSK |
46 / 57 80.70% PC |
3 / 19 15.79% LIB |
||||||||||
2015 | 84 / 87 96.55% NPD |
0 / 27 0.00% LIB |
35 / 40 87.50% LIB |
17 / 19 89.47% IND |
|||||||||
2014 | 107 / 107 100.00% LIB |
49 / 125 39.20% PLQ |
30 / 49 61.22% LIB |
||||||||||
2013 | 80 / 85 94.12% LIB |
43 / 51 84.31% LIB |
13 / 22 59.09% IND |
||||||||||
2012 | 87 / 87 100.00% PC |
20 / 125 16.00% PQ |
|||||||||||
2011 | 9 / 58 15.52% PSK |
49 / 57 85.96% NPD |
107 / 107 100.00% LIB |
1 / 27 3.70% LIB |
33 / 48 68.75% PC |
3 / 19 15.79% YP |
12 / 19 63.16% IND |
||||||
2010 | 13 / 55 23.64% PC |
||||||||||||
2009 | 84 / 85 98.82% LIB |
41 / 52 78.85% NPD |
|||||||||||
2008 | 83 / 83 100.00% PC |
123 / 125 98.40% PLQ |
8 / 19 42.11% IND |
||||||||||
2007 | 2 / 58 3.45% PSK |
51 / 57 89.47% NPD |
107 / 107 100.00% LIB |
46 / 125 36.80% PLQ |
0 / 27 0.00% LIB |
12 / 48 25.00% PC |
6 / 19 31.58% IND |
||||||
2006 | 16 / 55 29.09% LIB |
43 / 52 82.69% PC |
4 / 18 22.22% YP |
||||||||||
2005 | 60 / 79 75.95% LIB |
||||||||||||
2004 | 82 / 83 98.80% PC |
2 / 19 10.53% IND |
|||||||||||
2003 | 8 / 58 13.79% NPD |
55 / 57 96.49% NPD |
103 / 103 100.00% LIB |
30 / 125 24.00% PLQ |
22 / 55 40.00% PC |
32 / 52 61.54% PC |
0 / 27 0.00% PC |
13 / 48 27.08% PC |
13 / 19 68.42% IND |
||||
2002 | 1 / 18 5.56% YP |
||||||||||||
2001 | 11 / 79 13.92% LIB |
74 / 83 89.16% PC |
|||||||||||
2000 | 0 / 27 0.00% PC |
1 / 17 5.88% LIB |
|||||||||||
1999 | 34 / 58 58.62% NPD |
18 / 57 31.58% NPD |
101 / 103 98.06% PC |
4 / 55 7.27% PC |
23 / 52 44.23% PC |
35 / 48 72.92% LIB |
6 / 19 31.58% IND |
1 / 19 5.26% IND |
|||||
1998 | 2 / 125 1.60% PQ |
26 / 52 50.00% LIB |
|||||||||||
1997 | 83 / 83 100.00% PC |
||||||||||||
1996 | 16 / 75 21.33% NPD |
0 / 27 0.00% PC |
12 / 48 25.00% LIB |
0 / 17 0.00% NPD |
|||||||||
1995 | 35 / 58 60.34% NPD |
16 / 57 28.07% PC |
95 / 130 73.08% PC |
9 / 55 16.36% LIB |
7 / 24 29.17% IND |
||||||||
1994 | 1 / 125 0.80% PQ |
||||||||||||
1993 | 68 / 83 81.93% PC |
5 / 52 9.62% LIB |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
19 / 52 36.54% LIB |
|||||||||
1992 | 1 / 17 5.88% YP |
||||||||||||
1991 | 6 / 75 8.00% NPD |
0 / 66 0.00% NPD |
5 / 58 8.62% LIB |
4 / 24 16.67% IND |
|||||||||
1990 | 18 / 57 31.58% PC |
109 / 130 83.85% NPD |
|||||||||||
1989 | 77 / 83 92.77% PC |
7 / 125 5.60% PLQ |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
1 / 52 1.92% LIB |
0 / 16 0.00% NPD |
||||||||
1988 | 12 / 57 21.05% PC |
3 / 52 5.77% PC |
|||||||||||
1987 | 106 / 130 81.54% LIB |
0 / 58 0.00% LIB |
6 / 24 25.00% IND |
||||||||||
1986 | 0 / 69 0.00% CS |
81 / 83 97.59% PC |
0 / 64 0.00% PC |
17 / 57 29.82% NPD |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
||||||||
1985 | 104 / 125 83.20% PC |
7 / 122 5.74% PLQ |
1 / 52 1.92% PC |
0 / 16 0.00% NPD |
|||||||||
1984 | 19 / 52 36.54% PC |
||||||||||||
1983 | 1 / 57 1.75% CS |
5 / 24 20.83% IND |
|||||||||||
1982 | 20 / 79 25.32% PC |
2 / 64 3.13% PC |
1 / 58 1.72% PC |
0 / 32 0.00% PC |
1 / 52 1.92% PC |
0 / 16 0.00% PC |
|||||||
1981 | 3 / 57 5.26% NPD |
116 / 125 92.80% PC |
1 / 122 0.82% PQ |
3 / 52 5.77% PC |
|||||||||
1979 | 9 / 57 15.79% CS |
47 / 79 59.49% PC |
0 / 32 0.00% PC |
6 / 52 11.54% PC |
14 / 22 63.64% IND |
||||||||
1978 | 0 / 61 0.00% NPD |
6 / 58 10.34% PC |
1 / 52 1.92% PC |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
8 / 16 50.00% PC |
||||||||
1977 | 5 / 57 8.77% PC |
79 / 125 63.20% PC |
|||||||||||
1976 | 1 / 110 0.91% PQ |
||||||||||||
1975 | 11 / 55 20.00% CS |
35 / 75 46.67% PC |
2 / 61 3.28% NPD |
73 / 125 58.40% PC |
5 / 51 9.80% PC |
5 / 15 33.33% IND |
|||||||
1974 | 1 / 58 1.72% PC |
0 / 46 0.00% LIB |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
6 / 12 50.00% IND |
|||||||||
1973 | 2 / 57 3.51% NPD |
2 / 110 1.82% PLQ |
|||||||||||
1972 | 20 / 55 36.36% NPD |
0 / 42 0.00% PC |
|||||||||||
1971 | 13 / 75 17.33% PC |
0 / 60 0.00% NPD |
14 / 117 11.97% PC |
0 / 42 0.00% LIB |
|||||||||
1970 | 1 / 108 0.93% PLQ |
0 / 58 0.00% PC |
1 / 46 2.17% LIB |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
2 / 7 28.57% IND |
2 / 10 20.00% IND |
|||||||
1969 | 13 / 55 23.64% CS |
34 / 57 59.65% NPD |
|||||||||||
1967 | 37 / 65 56.92% CS |
1 / 59 1.69% LIB |
69 / 117 58.97% PC |
0 / 58 0.00% LIB |
1 / 46 2.17% PC |
4 / 7 57.14% IND |
|||||||
1966 | 14 / 55 25.45% CS |
37 / 57 64.91% PC |
20 / 108 18.52% UN |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
11 / 42 26.19% LIB |
||||||||
1964 | 1 / 59 1.69% LIB |
2 / 4 50.00% IND |
|||||||||||
1963 | 13 / 52 25.00% CS |
37 / 63 58.73% CS |
69 / 108 63.89% PC |
52 LIB |
1 / 43 2.33% PC |
||||||||
1962 | 27 / 57 47.37% PC |
4 / 95 4.21% PLQ |
30 PC |
20 / 42 47.62% LIB |
|||||||||
1960 | 10 / 52 19.23% CS |
2 / 55 3.64% FCC |
4 / 95 4.21% PLQ |
52 LIB |
0 / 43 0.00% PC |
2 / 4 50.00% IND |
|||||||
1959 | 22 / 65 33.85% CS |
24 / 57 42.11% PC |
67 / 98 68.37% PC |
30 PC |
5 / 36 13.89% LIB |
||||||||
1958 | 35 / 57 61.40% PC |
||||||||||||
1957 | 1 / 4 25.00% IND |
||||||||||||
1956 | 20 / 52 38.46% CS |
0 / 53 0.00% FCC |
6 / 93 6.45% UN |
52 PC |
0 / 43 0.00% PC |
5 / 36 13.89% LIB |
|||||||
1955 | 6 / 61 9.84% CS |
61 / 98 62.24% PC |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1954 | 1 / 4 25.00% IND |
||||||||||||
1953 | 17 / 48 35.42% CS |
19 / 57 33.33% LIBP |
0 / 37 0.00% LIB |
||||||||||
1952 | 28 / 48 58.33% CS |
19 / 61 31.15% CS |
0 / 53 0.00% FCC |
11 / 92 11.96% UN |
52 PC |
||||||||
1951 | 45 / 90 50.00% PC |
30 LIB |
2 / 28 7.14% LIB |
3 / 3 100.00% IND |
|||||||||
1949 | 3 / 48 6.25% COAL |
14 / 57 24.56% COAL |
1 / 37 2.70% LIB |
1 / 28 3.57% LIB |
|||||||||
1948 | 13 / 57 22.81% CS |
1 / 52 1.92% FCC |
47 / 90 52.22% PC |
11 / 92 11.96% UN |
52 LIB |
||||||||
1947 | 30 LIB |
||||||||||||
1945 | 9 / 48 18.75% COAL |
25 / 55 45.45% COAL |
24 / 90 26.67% PC |
11 / 30 36.67% LIB |
|||||||||
1944 | 9 / 60 15.00% CS |
5 / 55 9.09% FCC |
17 / 91 18.68% UN |
48 LIB |
|||||||||
1943 | 78 / 90 86.67% PC |
30 LIB |
|||||||||||
1941 | 11 / 48 22.92% LIB |
19 / 55 34.55% COAL |
13 / 30 43.33% LIB |
||||||||||
1940 | 9 / 57 15.79% CS |
||||||||||||
1939 | 2 / 86 2.33% PLQ |
48 LIB |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1938 | 1 / 52 1.92% LIB |
||||||||||||
1937 | 11 / 48 22.92% LIB |
16 / 90 17.78% LIB |
0 / 30 0.00% LIB |
||||||||||
1936 | 15 / 55 27.27% LIBP |
9 / 90 10.00% UN |
|||||||||||
1935 | 0 / 63 0.00% CS |
10 / 90 11.11% PLQ |
48 LIB |
30 LIB |
|||||||||
1934 | 1 / 55 1.82% LIB |
16 / 90 17.78% LIB |
|||||||||||
1933 | 7 / 47 14.89% LIB |
0 / 30 0.00% LIB |
|||||||||||
1932 | 4 / 55 7.27% LIBP |
||||||||||||
1931 | 4 / 90 4.44% PLQ |
30 CONS |
|||||||||||
1930 | 8 / 63 12.70% FUA |
48 CONS |
|||||||||||
1929 | 1 / 63 1.59% CONS |
55 / 112 49.11% LC |
|||||||||||
1928 | 6 / 48 12.50% CONS |
43 LC |
|||||||||||
1927 | 23 / 55 41.82% PROG |
20 / 85 23.53% PLQ |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1926 | 11 / 60 18.33% FUA |
35 / 112 31.25% LC |
|||||||||||
1925 | 34 / 63 53.97% LIB |
48 CONS |
43 LC |
||||||||||
1924 | 16 / 48 33.33% LIB |
||||||||||||
1923 | 76 / 111 68.47% LC |
32 / 85 37.65% PLQ |
30 CONS |
||||||||||
1922 | 15 / 55 27.27% PROG |
||||||||||||
1921 | 1 / 61 1.64% FUA |
63 LIB |
|||||||||||
1920 | 6 / 47 12.77% LIB |
18 / 55 32.73% LIB |
48 LIB |
43 LIB |
|||||||||
1919 | 25 / 111 22.52% FUO |
17 / 81 20.99% PLQ |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1917 | 11 / 58 18.97% LIB |
5 / 62 8.06% LIB |
48 LIB |
||||||||||
1916 | 21 / 47 44.68% LIB |
17 / 81 20.99% PLQ |
43 LIB |
||||||||||
1915 | 2 / 47 4.26% LIB |
30 CONS |
|||||||||||
1914 | 0 / 49 0.00% CONS |
20 / 111 18.02% LC |
|||||||||||
1913 | 11 / 56 19.64% LIB |
||||||||||||
1912 | 10 / 42 23.81% LC |
31 / 54 57.41% LIB |
21 / 81 25.93% PLQ |
48 IND |
30 CONS |
||||||||
1911 | 37 / 106 34.91% LC |
38 LIB |
|||||||||||
1910 | 1 / 41 2.44% CONS |
||||||||||||
1909 | 13 / 42 30.95% LC |
1 / 41 2.44% LIB |
|||||||||||
1908 | 7 / 41 17.07% LIB |
27 / 106 25.47% LC |
15 / 74 20.27% PLQ |
46 IND |
30 LIB |
||||||||
1907 | 22 / 42 52.38% LC |
0 / 41 0.00% CONS |
|||||||||||
1906 | 38 LIB |
||||||||||||
1905 | 25 LIB |
25 LIB |
25 / 98 25.51% LC |
||||||||||
1904 | 17 / 74 22.97% PLQ |
30 LIB |
|||||||||||
1903 | 0 / 42 0.00% LC |
0 / 40 0.00% CONS |
46 IND |
||||||||||
1902 | 35 LICO |
22 / 98 22.45% LIB |
|||||||||||
1901 | 38 LIB |
||||||||||||
1900 | 20 / 38 52.63% IND |
12 / 74 16.22% PLQ |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1899 | 5 / 40 12.50% CONS |
46 IND |
|||||||||||
1898 | 18 / 38 47.37% IND |
31 IND |
9 / 94 9.57% LIB |
||||||||||
1897 | 13 / 74 17.57% PLQ |
38 LIB |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1896 | 7 / 40 17.50% LIB |
||||||||||||
1895 | 46 IND |
||||||||||||
1894 | 0 / 33 0.00% IND |
29 IND |
29 / 94 30.85% LIB |
38 LIB |
|||||||||
1893 | 30 LIB |
||||||||||||
1892 | 5 / 40 12.50% LIB |
0 / 73 0.00% CONS |
41 IND |
||||||||||
1891 | 26 IND |
||||||||||||
1890 | 8 / 33 24.24% IND |
35 / 91 38.46% LIB |
23 / 73 31.51% PLQ |
41 IND |
38 LIB |
30 CONS |
|||||||
1888 | 22 IND |
38 LIB |
|||||||||||
1886 | 4 / 27 14.81% IND |
28 / 35 80.00% CONS |
30 / 90 33.33% LIB |
16 / 65 24.62% CONS |
41 IND |
38 LIB |
30 CONS |
||||||
1883 | 30 CONS |
28 / 88 31.82% LIB |
|||||||||||
1882 | 3 / 25 12.00% IND |
41 IND |
38 LIB |
30 CONS |
|||||||||
1881 | 26 / 65 40.00% CONS |
||||||||||||
1879 | 24 CONS |
39 / 88 44.32% LIB |
30 CONS |
||||||||||
1878 | 3 / 25 12.00% IND |
9 / 24 37.50% IND |
15 / 65 23.08% PLQ |
41 IND |
38 LC |
||||||||
1876 | 30 FREE |
||||||||||||
1875 | 1 / 25 4.00% IND |
21 / 88 23.86% LIB |
19 / 65 29.23% CONS |
||||||||||
1874 | 9 / 24 37.50% IND |
41 IND |
38 LIB |
||||||||||
1873 | 30 CONS |
||||||||||||
1871 | 25 IND |
37 / 82 45.12% LIB |
15 / 65 23.08% CONS |
38 LIB |
|||||||||
1870 | 24 IND |
41 IND |
|||||||||||
1867 | 10 / 82 12.20% LC |
5 / 65 7.69% CONS |
38 ANTI |
||||||||||
1866 | 41 IND |
23 circonscriptions | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Juridiction: Type d'élection: Années: Ordre: |
Québec (Provincial} Élections générales Entre 1890 et 1890 Comté (alpha.) |
|||||
Évènement | Circonscription | Élu·e·s | ||||
QC | 7 | G | 17 jun 1890 | Argenteuil Éligible: 2,741 Participation: 56.48% Personne: 1,193 (43.52%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 jun 1890 | Beauce Éligible: 6,238 Participation: 61.65% Personne: 2,392 (38.35%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 jun 1890 | Châteauguay Éligible: 3,153 Participation: 60.80% Personne: 1,236 (39.20%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 jun 1890 | Chicoutimi-Saguenay Éligible: 4,218 Participation: 52.70% Personne: 1,995 (47.30%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 jun 1890 | Compton Éligible: 5,401 Participation: 56.64% Personne: 2,342 (43.36%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 jun 1890 | Deux-Montagnes Éligible: 3,013 Participation: 57.85% Personne: 1,270 (42.15%) |
CONI |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 jun 1890 | Drummond Éligible: 3,293 Participation: 61.07% Personne: 1,282 (38.93%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 jun 1890 | Hochelaga Éligible: 15,428 Participation: 48.74% Personne: 7,908 (51.26%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 jun 1890 | L'Islet Éligible: 3,617 Participation: 48.60% Personne: 1,859 (51.40%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 jun 1890 | Montmagny Éligible: 2,491 Participation: 61.14% Personne: 968 (38.86%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 jun 1890 | Montréal no 1 Éligible: 6,477 Participation: 59.22% Personne: 2,641 (40.78%) |
O |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 jun 1890 | Montréal no 2 Éligible: 6,945 Participation: 61.45% Personne: 2,677 (38.55%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 jun 1890 | Montréal no 3 Éligible: 4,590 Participation: 57.36% Personne: 1,957 (42.64%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 jun 1890 | Montréal no 4 Éligible: 3,046 Participation: 64.41% Personne: 1,084 (35.59%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 jun 1890 | Nicolet Éligible: 5,629 Participation: 62.75% Personne: 2,097 (37.25%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 jun 1890 | Ottawa Éligible: 8,443 Participation: 56.85% Personne: 3,643 (43.15%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 jun 1890 | Québec-Ouest Éligible: 1,996 Participation: 56.26% Personne: 873 (43.74%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 jun 1890 | Richmond Éligible: 3,678 Participation: 64.06% Personne: 1,322 (35.94%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 jun 1890 | Saint-Jean Éligible: 2,624 Participation: 54.73% Personne: 1,188 (45.27%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 jun 1890 | Shefford Éligible: 5,385 Participation: 50.31% Personne: 2,676 (49.69%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 jun 1890 | Sherbrooke Éligible: 3,112 Participation: 61.57% Personne: 1,196 (38.43%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 jun 1890 | Stanstead Éligible: 4,340 Participation: 64.45% Personne: 1,543 (35.55%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 jun 1890 | Wolfe Éligible: 2,995 Participation: 65.94% Personne: 1,020 (34.06%) |
CONS |