par Maurice Y. Michaud (il/lui)
C'est avec un mélange de tristesse et de dégoût que je remets ce Prix du Pire Électorat à la province de l'Ontario, qui est décerné à la juridiction ayant le pire taux de participation, qui a mené Personne à gagner le plus de sièges au Canada.
Arrêtez de rire, Alberta, Colombie-Britannique et Manitoba ! Vous êtes presque aussi pire. Quant à toi, Terre-Neuve, une carence en huile de foie de morue depuis 1993 semble t'empêcher de te bâtir assez de force pour aller voter. (On t'excuse pour 2021, à cause de la vague de COVID durant la campagne.) Puis ça ne va pas, chère Nouvelle-Écosse ? Autrefois en tête de classe, maintenant tu te retrouves en queue de peloton avec les provinces de l'Ouest. Et oui, Saskatchewan, tu glisses !
Mais bravo à l'Île-du-Prince-Édouard ! Tu restes la meilleure de la classe. Certes, tu as laissé passer Personne une fois sur quatre en 2023, ce qui est beaucoup pour toi, mais une fois n'est pas coutume, n'est-ce pas ?
Dans ce tableau, chaque grand nombre en gras représente le nombre de fois où Personne a gagné lors de ces élections générales particulières. Tous ces nombres, sauf si la valeur est zéro, sont cliquables. Ainsi, vous pouvez obtenir la liste des comtés où Personne a gagné, ainsi que les noms de ceuxes qui ont effectivement été élu·e·s.
Année | BC | AB | SK | MB | ON | QC | NB | NS | PE | NL | YT | NT | NU |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 | 59 / 87 67.82% PCU |
56 / 57 98.25% NPD |
7 / 27 25.93% PC |
13 / 19 68.42% IND |
|||||||||
2022 | 124 / 124 100.00% PC |
64 / 125 51.20% CAQ |
|||||||||||
2021 | 49 / 55 89.09% PC |
40 / 40 100.00% LIB |
12 / 19 63.16% LIB |
16 / 22 72.73% IND |
|||||||||
2020 | 83 / 87 95.40% NPD |
45 / 61 73.77% PSK |
20 / 49 40.82% PC |
||||||||||
2019 | 35 / 87 40.23% PCU |
51 / 57 89.47% PC |
3 / 27 11.11% PC |
28 / 40 70.00% LIB |
16 / 19 84.21% IND |
||||||||
2018 | 122 / 124 98.39% PC |
71 / 125 56.80% CAQ |
32 / 49 65.31% LIB |
||||||||||
2017 | 77 / 87 88.51% LIB |
47 / 51 92.16% LIB |
14 / 22 63.64% IND |
||||||||||
2016 | 39 / 61 63.93% PSK |
46 / 57 80.70% PC |
3 / 19 15.79% LIB |
||||||||||
2015 | 84 / 87 96.55% NPD |
0 / 27 0.00% LIB |
35 / 40 87.50% LIB |
17 / 19 89.47% IND |
|||||||||
2014 | 107 / 107 100.00% LIB |
49 / 125 39.20% PLQ |
30 / 49 61.22% LIB |
||||||||||
2013 | 80 / 85 94.12% LIB |
43 / 51 84.31% LIB |
13 / 22 59.09% IND |
||||||||||
2012 | 87 / 87 100.00% PC |
20 / 125 16.00% PQ |
|||||||||||
2011 | 9 / 58 15.52% PSK |
49 / 57 85.96% NPD |
107 / 107 100.00% LIB |
1 / 27 3.70% LIB |
33 / 48 68.75% PC |
3 / 19 15.79% YP |
12 / 19 63.16% IND |
||||||
2010 | 13 / 55 23.64% PC |
||||||||||||
2009 | 84 / 85 98.82% LIB |
41 / 52 78.85% NPD |
|||||||||||
2008 | 83 / 83 100.00% PC |
123 / 125 98.40% PLQ |
8 / 19 42.11% IND |
||||||||||
2007 | 2 / 58 3.45% PSK |
51 / 57 89.47% NPD |
107 / 107 100.00% LIB |
46 / 125 36.80% PLQ |
0 / 27 0.00% LIB |
12 / 48 25.00% PC |
6 / 19 31.58% IND |
||||||
2006 | 16 / 55 29.09% LIB |
43 / 52 82.69% PC |
4 / 18 22.22% YP |
||||||||||
2005 | 60 / 79 75.95% LIB |
||||||||||||
2004 | 82 / 83 98.80% PC |
2 / 19 10.53% IND |
|||||||||||
2003 | 8 / 58 13.79% NPD |
55 / 57 96.49% NPD |
103 / 103 100.00% LIB |
30 / 125 24.00% PLQ |
22 / 55 40.00% PC |
32 / 52 61.54% PC |
0 / 27 0.00% PC |
13 / 48 27.08% PC |
13 / 19 68.42% IND |
||||
2002 | 1 / 18 5.56% YP |
||||||||||||
2001 | 11 / 79 13.92% LIB |
74 / 83 89.16% PC |
|||||||||||
2000 | 0 / 27 0.00% PC |
1 / 17 5.88% LIB |
|||||||||||
1999 | 34 / 58 58.62% NPD |
18 / 57 31.58% NPD |
101 / 103 98.06% PC |
4 / 55 7.27% PC |
23 / 52 44.23% PC |
35 / 48 72.92% LIB |
6 / 19 31.58% IND |
1 / 19 5.26% IND |
|||||
1998 | 2 / 125 1.60% PQ |
26 / 52 50.00% LIB |
|||||||||||
1997 | 83 / 83 100.00% PC |
||||||||||||
1996 | 16 / 75 21.33% NPD |
0 / 27 0.00% PC |
12 / 48 25.00% LIB |
0 / 17 0.00% NPD |
|||||||||
1995 | 35 / 58 60.34% NPD |
16 / 57 28.07% PC |
95 / 130 73.08% PC |
9 / 55 16.36% LIB |
7 / 24 29.17% IND |
||||||||
1994 | 1 / 125 0.80% PQ |
||||||||||||
1993 | 68 / 83 81.93% PC |
5 / 52 9.62% LIB |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
19 / 52 36.54% LIB |
|||||||||
1992 | 1 / 17 5.88% YP |
||||||||||||
1991 | 6 / 75 8.00% NPD |
0 / 66 0.00% NPD |
5 / 58 8.62% LIB |
4 / 24 16.67% IND |
|||||||||
1990 | 18 / 57 31.58% PC |
109 / 130 83.85% NPD |
|||||||||||
1989 | 77 / 83 92.77% PC |
7 / 125 5.60% PLQ |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
1 / 52 1.92% LIB |
0 / 16 0.00% NPD |
||||||||
1988 | 12 / 57 21.05% PC |
3 / 52 5.77% PC |
|||||||||||
1987 | 106 / 130 81.54% LIB |
0 / 58 0.00% LIB |
6 / 24 25.00% IND |
||||||||||
1986 | 0 / 69 0.00% CS |
81 / 83 97.59% PC |
0 / 64 0.00% PC |
17 / 57 29.82% NPD |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
||||||||
1985 | 104 / 125 83.20% PC |
7 / 122 5.74% PLQ |
1 / 52 1.92% PC |
0 / 16 0.00% NPD |
|||||||||
1984 | 19 / 52 36.54% PC |
||||||||||||
1983 | 1 / 57 1.75% CS |
5 / 24 20.83% IND |
|||||||||||
1982 | 20 / 79 25.32% PC |
2 / 64 3.13% PC |
1 / 58 1.72% PC |
0 / 32 0.00% PC |
1 / 52 1.92% PC |
0 / 16 0.00% PC |
|||||||
1981 | 3 / 57 5.26% NPD |
116 / 125 92.80% PC |
1 / 122 0.82% PQ |
3 / 52 5.77% PC |
|||||||||
1979 | 9 / 57 15.79% CS |
47 / 79 59.49% PC |
0 / 32 0.00% PC |
6 / 52 11.54% PC |
14 / 22 63.64% IND |
||||||||
1978 | 0 / 61 0.00% NPD |
6 / 58 10.34% PC |
1 / 52 1.92% PC |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
8 / 16 50.00% PC |
||||||||
1977 | 5 / 57 8.77% PC |
79 / 125 63.20% PC |
|||||||||||
1976 | 1 / 110 0.91% PQ |
||||||||||||
1975 | 11 / 55 20.00% CS |
35 / 75 46.67% PC |
2 / 61 3.28% NPD |
73 / 125 58.40% PC |
5 / 51 9.80% PC |
5 / 15 33.33% IND |
|||||||
1974 | 1 / 58 1.72% PC |
0 / 46 0.00% LIB |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
6 / 12 50.00% IND |
|||||||||
1973 | 2 / 57 3.51% NPD |
2 / 110 1.82% PLQ |
|||||||||||
1972 | 20 / 55 36.36% NPD |
0 / 42 0.00% PC |
|||||||||||
1971 | 13 / 75 17.33% PC |
0 / 60 0.00% NPD |
14 / 117 11.97% PC |
0 / 42 0.00% LIB |
|||||||||
1970 | 1 / 108 0.93% PLQ |
0 / 58 0.00% PC |
1 / 46 2.17% LIB |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
2 / 7 28.57% IND |
2 / 10 20.00% IND |
|||||||
1969 | 13 / 55 23.64% CS |
34 / 57 59.65% NPD |
|||||||||||
1967 | 37 / 65 56.92% CS |
1 / 59 1.69% LIB |
69 / 117 58.97% PC |
0 / 58 0.00% LIB |
1 / 46 2.17% PC |
4 / 7 57.14% IND |
|||||||
1966 | 14 / 55 25.45% CS |
37 / 57 64.91% PC |
20 / 108 18.52% UN |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
11 / 42 26.19% LIB |
||||||||
1964 | 1 / 59 1.69% LIB |
2 / 4 50.00% IND |
|||||||||||
1963 | 13 / 52 25.00% CS |
37 / 63 58.73% CS |
69 / 108 63.89% PC |
52 LIB |
1 / 43 2.33% PC |
||||||||
1962 | 27 / 57 47.37% PC |
4 / 95 4.21% PLQ |
30 PC |
20 / 42 47.62% LIB |
|||||||||
1960 | 10 / 52 19.23% CS |
2 / 55 3.64% FCC |
4 / 95 4.21% PLQ |
52 LIB |
0 / 43 0.00% PC |
2 / 4 50.00% IND |
|||||||
1959 | 22 / 65 33.85% CS |
24 / 57 42.11% PC |
67 / 98 68.37% PC |
30 PC |
5 / 36 13.89% LIB |
||||||||
1958 | 35 / 57 61.40% PC |
||||||||||||
1957 | 1 / 4 25.00% IND |
||||||||||||
1956 | 20 / 52 38.46% CS |
0 / 53 0.00% FCC |
6 / 93 6.45% UN |
52 PC |
0 / 43 0.00% PC |
5 / 36 13.89% LIB |
|||||||
1955 | 6 / 61 9.84% CS |
61 / 98 62.24% PC |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1954 | 1 / 4 25.00% IND |
||||||||||||
1953 | 17 / 48 35.42% CS |
19 / 57 33.33% LIBP |
0 / 37 0.00% LIB |
||||||||||
1952 | 28 / 48 58.33% CS |
19 / 61 31.15% CS |
0 / 53 0.00% FCC |
11 / 92 11.96% UN |
52 PC |
||||||||
1951 | 45 / 90 50.00% PC |
30 LIB |
2 / 28 7.14% LIB |
3 / 3 100.00% IND |
|||||||||
1949 | 3 / 48 6.25% COAL |
14 / 57 24.56% COAL |
1 / 37 2.70% LIB |
1 / 28 3.57% LIB |
|||||||||
1948 | 13 / 57 22.81% CS |
1 / 52 1.92% FCC |
47 / 90 52.22% PC |
11 / 92 11.96% UN |
52 LIB |
||||||||
1947 | 30 LIB |
||||||||||||
1945 | 9 / 48 18.75% COAL |
25 / 55 45.45% COAL |
24 / 90 26.67% PC |
11 / 30 36.67% LIB |
|||||||||
1944 | 9 / 60 15.00% CS |
5 / 55 9.09% FCC |
17 / 91 18.68% UN |
48 LIB |
|||||||||
1943 | 78 / 90 86.67% PC |
30 LIB |
|||||||||||
1941 | 11 / 48 22.92% LIB |
19 / 55 34.55% COAL |
13 / 30 43.33% LIB |
||||||||||
1940 | 9 / 57 15.79% CS |
||||||||||||
1939 | 2 / 86 2.33% PLQ |
48 LIB |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1938 | 1 / 52 1.92% LIB |
||||||||||||
1937 | 11 / 48 22.92% LIB |
16 / 90 17.78% LIB |
0 / 30 0.00% LIB |
||||||||||
1936 | 15 / 55 27.27% LIBP |
9 / 90 10.00% UN |
|||||||||||
1935 | 0 / 63 0.00% CS |
10 / 90 11.11% PLQ |
48 LIB |
30 LIB |
|||||||||
1934 | 1 / 55 1.82% LIB |
16 / 90 17.78% LIB |
|||||||||||
1933 | 7 / 47 14.89% LIB |
0 / 30 0.00% LIB |
|||||||||||
1932 | 4 / 55 7.27% LIBP |
||||||||||||
1931 | 4 / 90 4.44% PLQ |
30 CONS |
|||||||||||
1930 | 8 / 63 12.70% FUA |
48 CONS |
|||||||||||
1929 | 1 / 63 1.59% CONS |
55 / 112 49.11% LC |
|||||||||||
1928 | 6 / 48 12.50% CONS |
43 LC |
|||||||||||
1927 | 23 / 55 41.82% PROG |
20 / 85 23.53% PLQ |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1926 | 11 / 60 18.33% FUA |
35 / 112 31.25% LC |
|||||||||||
1925 | 34 / 63 53.97% LIB |
48 CONS |
43 LC |
||||||||||
1924 | 16 / 48 33.33% LIB |
||||||||||||
1923 | 76 / 111 68.47% LC |
32 / 85 37.65% PLQ |
30 CONS |
||||||||||
1922 | 15 / 55 27.27% PROG |
||||||||||||
1921 | 1 / 61 1.64% FUA |
63 LIB |
|||||||||||
1920 | 6 / 47 12.77% LIB |
18 / 55 32.73% LIB |
48 LIB |
43 LIB |
|||||||||
1919 | 25 / 111 22.52% FUO |
17 / 81 20.99% PLQ |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1917 | 11 / 58 18.97% LIB |
5 / 62 8.06% LIB |
48 LIB |
||||||||||
1916 | 21 / 47 44.68% LIB |
17 / 81 20.99% PLQ |
43 LIB |
||||||||||
1915 | 2 / 47 4.26% LIB |
30 CONS |
|||||||||||
1914 | 0 / 49 0.00% CONS |
20 / 111 18.02% LC |
|||||||||||
1913 | 11 / 56 19.64% LIB |
||||||||||||
1912 | 10 / 42 23.81% LC |
31 / 54 57.41% LIB |
21 / 81 25.93% PLQ |
48 IND |
30 CONS |
||||||||
1911 | 37 / 106 34.91% LC |
38 LIB |
|||||||||||
1910 | 1 / 41 2.44% CONS |
||||||||||||
1909 | 13 / 42 30.95% LC |
1 / 41 2.44% LIB |
|||||||||||
1908 | 7 / 41 17.07% LIB |
27 / 106 25.47% LC |
15 / 74 20.27% PLQ |
46 IND |
30 LIB |
||||||||
1907 | 22 / 42 52.38% LC |
0 / 41 0.00% CONS |
|||||||||||
1906 | 38 LIB |
||||||||||||
1905 | 25 LIB |
25 LIB |
25 / 98 25.51% LC |
||||||||||
1904 | 17 / 74 22.97% PLQ |
30 LIB |
|||||||||||
1903 | 0 / 42 0.00% LC |
0 / 40 0.00% CONS |
46 IND |
||||||||||
1902 | 35 LICO |
22 / 98 22.45% LIB |
|||||||||||
1901 | 38 LIB |
||||||||||||
1900 | 20 / 38 52.63% IND |
12 / 74 16.22% PLQ |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1899 | 5 / 40 12.50% CONS |
46 IND |
|||||||||||
1898 | 18 / 38 47.37% IND |
31 IND |
9 / 94 9.57% LIB |
||||||||||
1897 | 13 / 74 17.57% PLQ |
38 LIB |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1896 | 7 / 40 17.50% LIB |
||||||||||||
1895 | 46 IND |
||||||||||||
1894 | 0 / 33 0.00% IND |
29 IND |
29 / 94 30.85% LIB |
38 LIB |
|||||||||
1893 | 30 LIB |
||||||||||||
1892 | 5 / 40 12.50% LIB |
0 / 73 0.00% CONS |
41 IND |
||||||||||
1891 | 26 IND |
||||||||||||
1890 | 8 / 33 24.24% IND |
35 / 91 38.46% LIB |
23 / 73 31.51% PLQ |
41 IND |
38 LIB |
30 CONS |
|||||||
1888 | 22 IND |
38 LIB |
|||||||||||
1886 | 4 / 27 14.81% IND |
28 / 35 80.00% CONS |
30 / 90 33.33% LIB |
16 / 65 24.62% CONS |
41 IND |
38 LIB |
30 CONS |
||||||
1883 | 30 CONS |
28 / 88 31.82% LIB |
|||||||||||
1882 | 3 / 25 12.00% IND |
41 IND |
38 LIB |
30 CONS |
|||||||||
1881 | 26 / 65 40.00% CONS |
||||||||||||
1879 | 24 CONS |
39 / 88 44.32% LIB |
30 CONS |
||||||||||
1878 | 3 / 25 12.00% IND |
9 / 24 37.50% IND |
15 / 65 23.08% PLQ |
41 IND |
38 LC |
||||||||
1876 | 30 FREE |
||||||||||||
1875 | 1 / 25 4.00% IND |
21 / 88 23.86% LIB |
19 / 65 29.23% CONS |
||||||||||
1874 | 9 / 24 37.50% IND |
41 IND |
38 LIB |
||||||||||
1873 | 30 CONS |
||||||||||||
1871 | 25 IND |
37 / 82 45.12% LIB |
15 / 65 23.08% CONS |
38 LIB |
|||||||||
1870 | 24 IND |
41 IND |
|||||||||||
1867 | 10 / 82 12.20% LC |
5 / 65 7.69% CONS |
38 ANTI |
||||||||||
1866 | 41 IND |
26 circonscriptions | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Juridiction: Type d'élection: Années: Ordre: |
Québec (Provincial} Élections générales Entre 1881 et 1881 Comté (alpha.) |
|||||
Évènement | Circonscription | Élu·e·s | ||||
QC | 5 | G | 2 déc 1881 | Beauharnois Éligible: 2,562 Participation: 51.56% Personne: 1,241 (48.44%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 5 | G | 2 déc 1881 | Berthier Éligible: 3,205 Participation: 62.68% Personne: 1,196 (37.32%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 5 | G | 2 déc 1881 | Châteauguay Éligible: 2,507 Participation: 55.52% Personne: 1,115 (44.48%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 5 | G | 2 déc 1881 | Compton Éligible: 4,151 Participation: 56.66% Personne: 1,799 (43.34%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 5 | G | 2 déc 1881 | Dorchester Éligible: 2,727 Participation: 60.69% Personne: 1,072 (39.31%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 5 | G | 2 déc 1881 | Drummond-Arthabaska Éligible: 5,595 Participation: 61.52% Personne: 2,153 (38.48%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 5 | G | 2 déc 1881 | Iberville Éligible: 2,527 Participation: 47.09% Personne: 1,337 (52.91%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 5 | G | 2 déc 1881 | Joliette Éligible: 3,156 Participation: 65.91% Personne: 1,076 (34.09%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 5 | G | 2 déc 1881 | Lévis Éligible: 4,830 Participation: 63.98% Personne: 1,740 (36.02%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 5 | G | 2 déc 1881 | Mégantic Éligible: 3,404 Participation: 59.90% Personne: 1,365 (40.10%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 5 | G | 2 déc 1881 | Missisquoi Éligible: 3,786 Participation: 55.28% Personne: 1,693 (44.72%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 5 | G | 2 déc 1881 | Montcalm Éligible: 2,773 Participation: 60.80% Personne: 1,087 (39.20%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 5 | G | 2 déc 1881 | Montréal-Centre Éligible: 2,698 Participation: 60.49% Personne: 1,066 (39.51%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 5 | G | 2 déc 1881 | Montréal-Est Éligible: 10,838 Participation: 49.49% Personne: 5,474 (50.51%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 5 | G | 2 déc 1881 | Montréal-Ouest Éligible: 12,509 Participation: 44.12% Personne: 6,990 (55.88%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 5 | G | 2 déc 1881 | Napierville Éligible: 1,983 Participation: 58.85% Personne: 816 (41.15%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 5 | G | 2 déc 1881 | Nicolet Éligible: 4,002 Participation: 65.92% Personne: 1,364 (34.08%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 5 | G | 2 déc 1881 | Ottawa Éligible: 7,417 Participation: 43.36% Personne: 4,201 (56.64%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 5 | G | 2 déc 1881 | Pontiac Éligible: 3,419 Participation: 54.72% Personne: 1,548 (45.28%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 5 | G | 2 déc 1881 | Québec-Centre Éligible: 2,604 Participation: 61.79% Personne: 995 (38.21%) |
PLQ |
|
QC | 5 | G | 2 déc 1881 | Québec-Ouest Éligible: 2,117 Participation: 62.73% Personne: 789 (37.27%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 5 | G | 2 déc 1881 | Richelieu Éligible: 3,283 Participation: 59.88% Personne: 1,317 (40.12%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 5 | G | 2 déc 1881 | Richmond-Wolfe Éligible: 4,686 Participation: 52.67% Personne: 2,218 (47.33%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 5 | G | 2 déc 1881 | Rimouski Éligible: 4,957 Participation: 58.89% Personne: 2,038 (41.11%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 5 | G | 2 déc 1881 | Rouville Éligible: 3,035 Participation: 54.30% Personne: 1,387 (45.70%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 5 | G | 2 déc 1881 | Shefford Éligible: 4,375 Participation: 59.61% Personne: 1,767 (40.39%) |
CONS |