by Maurice Y. Michaud (he/him)
It is with a mix of sadness and disgust that I present this, the Worst Electorate Award, to the province of Ontario, which is given to the jurisdiction with the worse electoral participation rate, which has led Nobody to winning the most seats in Canada.
Now stop that chuckling, Alberta, British Columbia, and Manitoba! You're almost as bad. As for you, Newfoundland, a lack of cod liver oil since 1993 seems to be preventing you from building enough strength to go vote. (You're excused, however, for 2021 because of the COVID outbreak during the campaign.) And what's wrong, dear Nova Scotia? You used to be one of the best in class; now, you're at the back of the pack with the Western provinces. And yes, Saskatchewan, you're slipping!
But congratulations, Prince Edward Island! You remain the best in class. Sure, you let Nobody slide through one time out of four in 2023, which is a lot for you, but one time does not a habit make, isn't that right?
In this table, each large number in bold represents the number of times that Nobody won in that particular general election. All these numbers, except if the value is zero, are clickable. Thus you can get the list of the ridings where Nobody has won, as well as the names of those who were in fact elected.
Year | BC | AB | SK | MB | ON | QC | NB | NS | PE | NL | YT | NT | NU |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 | 59 / 87 67.82% UCP |
56 / 57 98.25% NDP |
7 / 27 25.93% PC |
13 / 19 68.42% IND |
|||||||||
2022 | 124 / 124 100.00% PC |
64 / 125 51.20% CAQ |
|||||||||||
2021 | 49 / 55 89.09% PC |
40 / 40 100.00% LIB |
12 / 19 63.16% LIB |
16 / 22 72.73% IND |
|||||||||
2020 | 83 / 87 95.40% NDP |
45 / 61 73.77% SKP |
20 / 49 40.82% PC |
||||||||||
2019 | 35 / 87 40.23% UCP |
51 / 57 89.47% PC |
3 / 27 11.11% PC |
28 / 40 70.00% LIB |
16 / 19 84.21% IND |
||||||||
2018 | 122 / 124 98.39% PC |
71 / 125 56.80% CAQ |
32 / 49 65.31% LIB |
||||||||||
2017 | 77 / 87 88.51% LIB |
47 / 51 92.16% LIB |
14 / 22 63.64% IND |
||||||||||
2016 | 39 / 61 63.93% SKP |
46 / 57 80.70% PC |
3 / 19 15.79% LIB |
||||||||||
2015 | 84 / 87 96.55% NDP |
0 / 27 0.00% LIB |
35 / 40 87.50% LIB |
17 / 19 89.47% IND |
|||||||||
2014 | 107 / 107 100.00% LIB |
49 / 125 39.20% QLP |
30 / 49 61.22% LIB |
||||||||||
2013 | 80 / 85 94.12% LIB |
43 / 51 84.31% LIB |
13 / 22 59.09% IND |
||||||||||
2012 | 87 / 87 100.00% PC |
20 / 125 16.00% PQ |
|||||||||||
2011 | 9 / 58 15.52% SKP |
49 / 57 85.96% NDP |
107 / 107 100.00% LIB |
1 / 27 3.70% LIB |
33 / 48 68.75% PC |
3 / 19 15.79% YP |
12 / 19 63.16% IND |
||||||
2010 | 13 / 55 23.64% PC |
||||||||||||
2009 | 84 / 85 98.82% LIB |
41 / 52 78.85% NDP |
|||||||||||
2008 | 83 / 83 100.00% PC |
123 / 125 98.40% QLP |
8 / 19 42.11% IND |
||||||||||
2007 | 2 / 58 3.45% SKP |
51 / 57 89.47% NDP |
107 / 107 100.00% LIB |
46 / 125 36.80% QLP |
0 / 27 0.00% LIB |
12 / 48 25.00% PC |
6 / 19 31.58% IND |
||||||
2006 | 16 / 55 29.09% LIB |
43 / 52 82.69% PC |
4 / 18 22.22% YP |
||||||||||
2005 | 60 / 79 75.95% LIB |
||||||||||||
2004 | 82 / 83 98.80% PC |
2 / 19 10.53% IND |
|||||||||||
2003 | 8 / 58 13.79% NDP |
55 / 57 96.49% NDP |
103 / 103 100.00% LIB |
30 / 125 24.00% QLP |
22 / 55 40.00% PC |
32 / 52 61.54% PC |
0 / 27 0.00% PC |
13 / 48 27.08% PC |
13 / 19 68.42% IND |
||||
2002 | 1 / 18 5.56% YP |
||||||||||||
2001 | 11 / 79 13.92% LIB |
74 / 83 89.16% PC |
|||||||||||
2000 | 0 / 27 0.00% PC |
1 / 17 5.88% LIB |
|||||||||||
1999 | 34 / 58 58.62% NDP |
18 / 57 31.58% NDP |
101 / 103 98.06% PC |
4 / 55 7.27% PC |
23 / 52 44.23% PC |
35 / 48 72.92% LIB |
6 / 19 31.58% IND |
1 / 19 5.26% IND |
|||||
1998 | 2 / 125 1.60% PQ |
26 / 52 50.00% LIB |
|||||||||||
1997 | 83 / 83 100.00% PC |
||||||||||||
1996 | 16 / 75 21.33% NDP |
0 / 27 0.00% PC |
12 / 48 25.00% LIB |
0 / 17 0.00% NDP |
|||||||||
1995 | 35 / 58 60.34% NDP |
16 / 57 28.07% PC |
95 / 130 73.08% PC |
9 / 55 16.36% LIB |
7 / 24 29.17% IND |
||||||||
1994 | 1 / 125 0.80% PQ |
||||||||||||
1993 | 68 / 83 81.93% PC |
5 / 52 9.62% LIB |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
19 / 52 36.54% LIB |
|||||||||
1992 | 1 / 17 5.88% YP |
||||||||||||
1991 | 6 / 75 8.00% NDP |
0 / 66 0.00% NDP |
5 / 58 8.62% LIB |
4 / 24 16.67% IND |
|||||||||
1990 | 18 / 57 31.58% PC |
109 / 130 83.85% NDP |
|||||||||||
1989 | 77 / 83 92.77% PC |
7 / 125 5.60% QLP |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
1 / 52 1.92% LIB |
0 / 16 0.00% NDP |
||||||||
1988 | 12 / 57 21.05% PC |
3 / 52 5.77% PC |
|||||||||||
1987 | 106 / 130 81.54% LIB |
0 / 58 0.00% LIB |
6 / 24 25.00% IND |
||||||||||
1986 | 0 / 69 0.00% SC |
81 / 83 97.59% PC |
0 / 64 0.00% PC |
17 / 57 29.82% NDP |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
||||||||
1985 | 104 / 125 83.20% PC |
7 / 122 5.74% QLP |
1 / 52 1.92% PC |
0 / 16 0.00% NDP |
|||||||||
1984 | 19 / 52 36.54% PC |
||||||||||||
1983 | 1 / 57 1.75% SC |
5 / 24 20.83% IND |
|||||||||||
1982 | 20 / 79 25.32% PC |
2 / 64 3.13% PC |
1 / 58 1.72% PC |
0 / 32 0.00% PC |
1 / 52 1.92% PC |
0 / 16 0.00% PC |
|||||||
1981 | 3 / 57 5.26% NDP |
116 / 125 92.80% PC |
1 / 122 0.82% PQ |
3 / 52 5.77% PC |
|||||||||
1979 | 9 / 57 15.79% SC |
47 / 79 59.49% PC |
0 / 32 0.00% PC |
6 / 52 11.54% PC |
14 / 22 63.64% IND |
||||||||
1978 | 0 / 61 0.00% NPD |
6 / 58 10.34% PC |
1 / 52 1.92% PC |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
8 / 16 50.00% PC |
||||||||
1977 | 5 / 57 8.77% PC |
79 / 125 63.20% PC |
|||||||||||
1976 | 1 / 110 0.91% PQ |
||||||||||||
1975 | 11 / 55 20.00% SC |
35 / 75 46.67% PC |
2 / 61 3.28% NPD |
73 / 125 58.40% PC |
5 / 51 9.80% PC |
5 / 15 33.33% IND |
|||||||
1974 | 1 / 58 1.72% PC |
0 / 46 0.00% LIB |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
6 / 12 50.00% IND |
|||||||||
1973 | 2 / 57 3.51% NDP |
2 / 110 1.82% QLP |
|||||||||||
1972 | 20 / 55 36.36% NDP |
0 / 42 0.00% PC |
|||||||||||
1971 | 13 / 75 17.33% PC |
0 / 60 0.00% NPD |
14 / 117 11.97% PC |
0 / 42 0.00% LIB |
|||||||||
1970 | 1 / 108 0.93% QLP |
0 / 58 0.00% PC |
1 / 46 2.17% LIB |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
2 / 7 28.57% IND |
2 / 10 20.00% IND |
|||||||
1969 | 13 / 55 23.64% SC |
34 / 57 59.65% NDP |
|||||||||||
1967 | 37 / 65 56.92% SC |
1 / 59 1.69% LIB |
69 / 117 58.97% PC |
0 / 58 0.00% LIB |
1 / 46 2.17% PC |
4 / 7 57.14% IND |
|||||||
1966 | 14 / 55 25.45% SC |
37 / 57 64.91% PC |
20 / 108 18.52% UN |
0 / 32 0.00% LIB |
11 / 42 26.19% LIB |
||||||||
1964 | 1 / 59 1.69% LIB |
2 / 4 50.00% IND |
|||||||||||
1963 | 13 / 52 25.00% SC |
37 / 63 58.73% SC |
69 / 108 63.89% PC |
52 LIB |
1 / 43 2.33% PC |
||||||||
1962 | 27 / 57 47.37% PC |
4 / 95 4.21% QLP |
30 PC |
20 / 42 47.62% LIB |
|||||||||
1960 | 10 / 52 19.23% SC |
2 / 55 3.64% CCF |
4 / 95 4.21% QLP |
52 LIB |
0 / 43 0.00% PC |
2 / 4 50.00% IND |
|||||||
1959 | 22 / 65 33.85% SC |
24 / 57 42.11% PC |
67 / 98 68.37% PC |
30 PC |
5 / 36 13.89% LIB |
||||||||
1958 | 35 / 57 61.40% PC |
||||||||||||
1957 | 1 / 4 25.00% IND |
||||||||||||
1956 | 20 / 52 38.46% SC |
0 / 53 0.00% CCF |
6 / 93 6.45% UN |
52 PC |
0 / 43 0.00% PC |
5 / 36 13.89% LIB |
|||||||
1955 | 6 / 61 9.84% SC |
61 / 98 62.24% PC |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1954 | 1 / 4 25.00% IND |
||||||||||||
1953 | 17 / 48 35.42% SC |
19 / 57 33.33% LIBP |
0 / 37 0.00% LIB |
||||||||||
1952 | 28 / 48 58.33% SC |
19 / 61 31.15% SC |
0 / 53 0.00% CCF |
11 / 92 11.96% UN |
52 PC |
||||||||
1951 | 45 / 90 50.00% PC |
30 LIB |
2 / 28 7.14% LIB |
3 / 3 100.00% IND |
|||||||||
1949 | 3 / 48 6.25% COAL |
14 / 57 24.56% COAL |
1 / 37 2.70% LIB |
1 / 28 3.57% LIB |
|||||||||
1948 | 13 / 57 22.81% SC |
1 / 52 1.92% CCF |
47 / 90 52.22% PC |
11 / 92 11.96% UN |
52 LIB |
||||||||
1947 | 30 LIB |
||||||||||||
1945 | 9 / 48 18.75% COAL |
25 / 55 45.45% COAL |
24 / 90 26.67% PC |
11 / 30 36.67% LIB |
|||||||||
1944 | 9 / 60 15.00% SC |
5 / 55 9.09% CCF |
17 / 91 18.68% UN |
48 LIB |
|||||||||
1943 | 78 / 90 86.67% PC |
30 LIB |
|||||||||||
1941 | 11 / 48 22.92% LIB |
19 / 55 34.55% COAL |
13 / 30 43.33% LIB |
||||||||||
1940 | 9 / 57 15.79% SC |
||||||||||||
1939 | 2 / 86 2.33% QLP |
48 LIB |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1938 | 1 / 52 1.92% LIB |
||||||||||||
1937 | 11 / 48 22.92% LIB |
16 / 90 17.78% LIB |
0 / 30 0.00% LIB |
||||||||||
1936 | 15 / 55 27.27% LIBP |
9 / 90 10.00% UN |
|||||||||||
1935 | 0 / 63 0.00% SC |
10 / 90 11.11% QLP |
48 LIB |
30 LIB |
|||||||||
1934 | 1 / 55 1.82% LIB |
16 / 90 17.78% LIB |
|||||||||||
1933 | 7 / 47 14.89% LIB |
0 / 30 0.00% LIB |
|||||||||||
1932 | 4 / 55 7.27% LIBP |
||||||||||||
1931 | 4 / 90 4.44% QLP |
30 CONS |
|||||||||||
1930 | 8 / 63 12.70% UFA |
48 CONS |
|||||||||||
1929 | 1 / 63 1.59% CONS |
55 / 112 49.11% LC |
|||||||||||
1928 | 6 / 48 12.50% CONS |
43 LC |
|||||||||||
1927 | 23 / 55 41.82% PROG |
20 / 85 23.53% QLP |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1926 | 11 / 60 18.33% UFA |
35 / 112 31.25% LC |
|||||||||||
1925 | 34 / 63 53.97% LIB |
48 CONS |
43 LC |
||||||||||
1924 | 16 / 48 33.33% LIB |
||||||||||||
1923 | 76 / 111 68.47% LC |
32 / 85 37.65% QLP |
30 CONS |
||||||||||
1922 | 15 / 55 27.27% PROG |
||||||||||||
1921 | 1 / 61 1.64% UFA |
63 LIB |
|||||||||||
1920 | 6 / 47 12.77% LIB |
18 / 55 32.73% LIB |
48 LIB |
43 LIB |
|||||||||
1919 | 25 / 111 22.52% UFO |
17 / 81 20.99% QLP |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1917 | 11 / 58 18.97% LIB |
5 / 62 8.06% LIB |
48 LIB |
||||||||||
1916 | 21 / 47 44.68% LIB |
17 / 81 20.99% QLP |
43 LIB |
||||||||||
1915 | 2 / 47 4.26% LIB |
30 CONS |
|||||||||||
1914 | 0 / 49 0.00% CONS |
20 / 111 18.02% LC |
|||||||||||
1913 | 11 / 56 19.64% LIB |
||||||||||||
1912 | 10 / 42 23.81% LC |
31 / 54 57.41% LIB |
21 / 81 25.93% QLP |
48 IND |
30 CONS |
||||||||
1911 | 37 / 106 34.91% LC |
38 LIB |
|||||||||||
1910 | 1 / 41 2.44% CONS |
||||||||||||
1909 | 13 / 42 30.95% LC |
1 / 41 2.44% LIB |
|||||||||||
1908 | 7 / 41 17.07% LIB |
27 / 106 25.47% LC |
15 / 74 20.27% QLP |
46 IND |
30 LIB |
||||||||
1907 | 22 / 42 52.38% LC |
0 / 41 0.00% CONS |
|||||||||||
1906 | 38 LIB |
||||||||||||
1905 | 25 LIB |
25 LIB |
25 / 98 25.51% LC |
||||||||||
1904 | 17 / 74 22.97% QLP |
30 LIB |
|||||||||||
1903 | 0 / 42 0.00% LC |
0 / 40 0.00% CONS |
46 IND |
||||||||||
1902 | 35 LICO |
22 / 98 22.45% LIB |
|||||||||||
1901 | 38 LIB |
||||||||||||
1900 | 20 / 38 52.63% IND |
12 / 74 16.22% QLP |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1899 | 5 / 40 12.50% CONS |
46 IND |
|||||||||||
1898 | 18 / 38 47.37% IND |
31 IND |
9 / 94 9.57% LIB |
||||||||||
1897 | 13 / 74 17.57% QLP |
38 LIB |
30 LIB |
||||||||||
1896 | 7 / 40 17.50% LIB |
||||||||||||
1895 | 46 IND |
||||||||||||
1894 | 0 / 33 0.00% IND |
29 IND |
29 / 94 30.85% LIB |
38 LIB |
|||||||||
1893 | 30 LIB |
||||||||||||
1892 | 5 / 40 12.50% LIB |
0 / 73 0.00% CONS |
41 IND |
||||||||||
1891 | 26 IND |
||||||||||||
1890 | 8 / 33 24.24% IND |
35 / 91 38.46% LIB |
23 / 73 31.51% QLP |
41 IND |
38 LIB |
30 CONS |
|||||||
1888 | 22 IND |
38 LIB |
|||||||||||
1886 | 4 / 27 14.81% IND |
28 / 35 80.00% CONS |
30 / 90 33.33% LIB |
16 / 65 24.62% CONS |
41 IND |
38 LIB |
30 CONS |
||||||
1883 | 30 CONS |
28 / 88 31.82% LIB |
|||||||||||
1882 | 3 / 25 12.00% IND |
41 IND |
38 LIB |
30 CONS |
|||||||||
1881 | 26 / 65 40.00% CONS |
||||||||||||
1879 | 24 CONS |
39 / 88 44.32% LIB |
30 CONS |
||||||||||
1878 | 3 / 25 12.00% IND |
9 / 24 37.50% IND |
15 / 65 23.08% QLP |
41 IND |
38 LC |
||||||||
1876 | 30 FREE |
||||||||||||
1875 | 1 / 25 4.00% IND |
21 / 88 23.86% LIB |
19 / 65 29.23% CONS |
||||||||||
1874 | 9 / 24 37.50% IND |
41 IND |
38 LIB |
||||||||||
1873 | 30 CONS |
||||||||||||
1871 | 25 IND |
37 / 82 45.12% LIB |
15 / 65 23.08% CONS |
38 LIB |
|||||||||
1870 | 24 IND |
41 IND |
|||||||||||
1867 | 10 / 82 12.20% LC |
5 / 65 7.69% CONS |
38 ANTI |
||||||||||
1866 | 41 IND |
23 ridings | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jurisdiction: Election type: Years: Order: |
Québec (Provincial} General election Between 1890 and 1890 Riding (alpha.) |
|||||
Event | Riding | Elected | ||||
QC | 7 | G | 17 Jun 1890 | Argenteuil Eligible: 2,741 Participation: 56.48% Nobody: 1,193 (43.52%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 Jun 1890 | Beauce Eligible: 6,238 Participation: 61.65% Nobody: 2,392 (38.35%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 Jun 1890 | Châteauguay Eligible: 3,153 Participation: 60.80% Nobody: 1,236 (39.20%) |
QLP |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 Jun 1890 | Chicoutimi-Saguenay Eligible: 4,218 Participation: 52.70% Nobody: 1,995 (47.30%) |
QLP |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 Jun 1890 | Compton Eligible: 5,401 Participation: 56.64% Nobody: 2,342 (43.36%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 Jun 1890 | Deux-Montagnes Eligible: 3,013 Participation: 57.85% Nobody: 1,270 (42.15%) |
ICON |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 Jun 1890 | Drummond Eligible: 3,293 Participation: 61.07% Nobody: 1,282 (38.93%) |
QLP |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 Jun 1890 | Hochelaga Eligible: 15,428 Participation: 48.74% Nobody: 7,908 (51.26%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 Jun 1890 | L'Islet Eligible: 3,617 Participation: 48.60% Nobody: 1,859 (51.40%) |
QLP |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 Jun 1890 | Montmagny Eligible: 2,491 Participation: 61.14% Nobody: 968 (38.86%) |
QLP |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 Jun 1890 | Montréal no 1 Eligible: 6,477 Participation: 59.22% Nobody: 2,641 (40.78%) |
O |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 Jun 1890 | Montréal no 2 Eligible: 6,945 Participation: 61.45% Nobody: 2,677 (38.55%) |
QLP |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 Jun 1890 | Montréal no 3 Eligible: 4,590 Participation: 57.36% Nobody: 1,957 (42.64%) |
QLP |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 Jun 1890 | Montréal no 4 Eligible: 3,046 Participation: 64.41% Nobody: 1,084 (35.59%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 Jun 1890 | Nicolet Eligible: 5,629 Participation: 62.75% Nobody: 2,097 (37.25%) |
QLP |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 Jun 1890 | Ottawa Eligible: 8,443 Participation: 56.85% Nobody: 3,643 (43.15%) |
QLP |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 Jun 1890 | Québec-Ouest Eligible: 1,996 Participation: 56.26% Nobody: 873 (43.74%) |
QLP |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 Jun 1890 | Richmond Eligible: 3,678 Participation: 64.06% Nobody: 1,322 (35.94%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 Jun 1890 | Saint-Jean Eligible: 2,624 Participation: 54.73% Nobody: 1,188 (45.27%) |
QLP |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 Jun 1890 | Shefford Eligible: 5,385 Participation: 50.31% Nobody: 2,676 (49.69%) |
QLP |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 Jun 1890 | Sherbrooke Eligible: 3,112 Participation: 61.57% Nobody: 1,196 (38.43%) |
CONS |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 Jun 1890 | Stanstead Eligible: 4,340 Participation: 64.45% Nobody: 1,543 (35.55%) |
QLP |
|
QC | 7 | G | 17 Jun 1890 | Wolfe Eligible: 2,995 Participation: 65.94% Nobody: 1,020 (34.06%) |
CONS |